Scholarlink

Background <p>To investigate osseous remodeling pattern of the condyle across different subtypes of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) using 3D model generated from ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT).</p> Methods <p>This single-center, retrospective study enrolled patients with unilateral TMD who underwent both U-HRCT and magnetic resonance imaging from November 2021 to June 2024. Temporomandibular joints (TMJs) were categorized into three TMD subtypes: disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), disc displacement without reduction (DDWoR), and osteoarthritis (OA). Condylar morphology parameters, including length, width, height, total volume, anterior volume, and posterior volume, were measured on 3D model derived from U-HRCT images by two independent observers. Affected and unaffected TMJs of the same patient were compared using paired sample <i>t</i>-test, and inter-group differences among TMD subtypes were assessed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.</p> Results <p>A total of 115 participants (mean age 34.6 ± 13.4 years, 103 females) were included. Compared with unaffected side, affected TMJ showed significantly smaller height (DDWR, DDWoR), width (OA), and volumetric data (all groups). Inter-group comparison of affected TMJ revealed significant differences in condylar height and total volume between DDWR and OA (<i>p</i> = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively). The posterior volume was the lowest in OA (399.71 ± 123.43 mm<sup>3</sup>), followed by DDWoR (517.51 ± 179.30 mm<sup>3</sup>) and DDWR (542.11 ± 153.76 mm<sup>3</sup>), while the anterior volume was smallest in DDWoR (309.49 ± 107.27 mm<sup>3</sup>), followed by OA (336.92 ± 128.81 mm<sup>3</sup>) and DDWR (361.50 ± 110.03 mm<sup>3</sup>).</p> Conclusion <p>U-HRCT-based 3D models reveal condylar osseous remodeling patterns across TMD subtypes, and posterior volume may serve as a potential osseous remodeling indicator to differentiate TMD subtypes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Condylar alteration in three subtypes of temporomandibular disorder based on U-HRCT: a cross-sectional study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月23日

查看全文
  • Ruowei Tang,
  • Wen Chen,
  • Ning Xu,
  • Xiaoqing Yuan,
  • Xuan Bai,
  • Bihe Zhang,
  • Xidong Zhang,
  • Zhenghan Yang,
  • Xiaofeng Huang,
  • Zhenchang Wang,
  • Pengfei Zhao,
  • Ning Zhang

摘要

Background

To investigate osseous remodeling pattern of the condyle across different subtypes of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) using 3D model generated from ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT).

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study enrolled patients with unilateral TMD who underwent both U-HRCT and magnetic resonance imaging from November 2021 to June 2024. Temporomandibular joints (TMJs) were categorized into three TMD subtypes: disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), disc displacement without reduction (DDWoR), and osteoarthritis (OA). Condylar morphology parameters, including length, width, height, total volume, anterior volume, and posterior volume, were measured on 3D model derived from U-HRCT images by two independent observers. Affected and unaffected TMJs of the same patient were compared using paired sample t-test, and inter-group differences among TMD subtypes were assessed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.

Results

A total of 115 participants (mean age 34.6 ± 13.4 years, 103 females) were included. Compared with unaffected side, affected TMJ showed significantly smaller height (DDWR, DDWoR), width (OA), and volumetric data (all groups). Inter-group comparison of affected TMJ revealed significant differences in condylar height and total volume between DDWR and OA (p = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively). The posterior volume was the lowest in OA (399.71 ± 123.43 mm3), followed by DDWoR (517.51 ± 179.30 mm3) and DDWR (542.11 ± 153.76 mm3), while the anterior volume was smallest in DDWoR (309.49 ± 107.27 mm3), followed by OA (336.92 ± 128.81 mm3) and DDWR (361.50 ± 110.03 mm3).

Conclusion

U-HRCT-based 3D models reveal condylar osseous remodeling patterns across TMD subtypes, and posterior volume may serve as a potential osseous remodeling indicator to differentiate TMD subtypes.