Scholarlink

Background <p>&#xa0;Porcelain-layered zirconia restorations are susceptible to chipping and delamination. This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of indirect composite resin to zirconia.</p> Methods <p>&#xa0;Fifty zirconia specimens were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 10): Control. 50-µm aluminum oxide (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) sandblasting (SB50). 110-µm Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> sandblasting (SB110). Glaze + hydrofluoric etching (Gl + HF). SB50 followed by glaze + hydrofluoric etching (SB50 + Gl + HF). After composite bonding and thermocycling (5,000 cycles), SBS was tested and failure modes were assessed. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests.</p> Results <p>&#xa0;SBS differed significantly among groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). SB110 (11.134 ± 0.866 MPa) and SB50 + Gl + HF (12.229 ± 1.101 MPa) showed statistically equivalent bond strength (<i>p</i> = 0.133, effect size -1.1) and were significantly higher than other groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, effect size 0.913). The Gl + HF group had the lowest strength (3.771 ± 0.905 MPa, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, effect size 0.913).</p> Conclusions <p>&#xa0;Indirect composite could be a viable alternative to porcelain for veneering zirconia restorations in the short term. Sandblasting with 110 µm alumina particles provided high bond strength equivalent to the more complex SB50 + Gl + HF protocol, offering a clinically simpler and safer surface treatment option.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Surface engineering of zirconia to improve indirect composite bonding: an in vitro study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月25日

查看全文
  • Dovan Nadhir Syawish,
  • Ihsan Nimat Kaka

摘要

Background

 Porcelain-layered zirconia restorations are susceptible to chipping and delamination. This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of indirect composite resin to zirconia.

Methods

 Fifty zirconia specimens were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 10): Control. 50-µm aluminum oxide (Al2O3) sandblasting (SB50). 110-µm Al2O3 sandblasting (SB110). Glaze + hydrofluoric etching (Gl + HF). SB50 followed by glaze + hydrofluoric etching (SB50 + Gl + HF). After composite bonding and thermocycling (5,000 cycles), SBS was tested and failure modes were assessed. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests.

Results

 SBS differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001). SB110 (11.134 ± 0.866 MPa) and SB50 + Gl + HF (12.229 ± 1.101 MPa) showed statistically equivalent bond strength (p = 0.133, effect size -1.1) and were significantly higher than other groups (p < 0.05, effect size 0.913). The Gl + HF group had the lowest strength (3.771 ± 0.905 MPa, p < 0.05, effect size 0.913).

Conclusions

 Indirect composite could be a viable alternative to porcelain for veneering zirconia restorations in the short term. Sandblasting with 110 µm alumina particles provided high bond strength equivalent to the more complex SB50 + Gl + HF protocol, offering a clinically simpler and safer surface treatment option.