Scholarlink

Background <p>Dental trauma is common within school communities, yet access to timely care remains a challenge. Insurance coverage can reduce financial barriers and support coordinated responses. However, there are limited insights into how traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are covered and framed in Student Accident Insurance (SAI). This study applies framework-guided criteria to evaluate the content and framing of TDI in Malaysian SAI policies from 2023 to 2025.</p> Method <p>A qualitative document analysis was conducted on a purposive sample of SAI products using predefined criteria based on standard insurance policy elements and Entman’s theory of framing. Content analysis was used to classify policy elements, while frame analysis examined how TDI was conceptualized in brochures, disclosure sheets and policy wordings.</p> Results <p>Of the 48 registered insurance providers, five SAI products offering TDI coverage for full-time students aged approximately 3 to 21, mainly in kindergartens, primary or secondary schools, were identified. Plans with premiums ranging from Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 10 to 30 were offered. Plans priced at MYR 20 and 30 typically included a TDI sublimit capped at MYR 500. Dental appliances, routine check-ups and dentures were excluded in AIA, Generali and Tokio Marine policies. TDI was uniformly framed as accident-related, with Zurich uniquely framing it as bodily injury. Coverage was for school activities, excluding high-risk sports. Responsibility was variably assigned to parents, school or both. Most providers required initial treatment within 24&#xa0;h, follow-up within 14 days and claims notice within 30 days of the accident. Zurich required earlier claims notice but allowed extended reimbursement.</p> Conclusion <p>Framework-guided criteria allow a systematic assessment of the different aspects through which SAI policies address and convey TDI coverage. Although Malaysian SAI policies offer generally affordable and standardised TDI coverage, variations in exclusions and framing highlight areas for policy improvement. Clear and consistent policy framing may contribute to strengthening community-based dental care by ensuring equitable and timely access to TDI management.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dental trauma coverage in student accident insurance: a framework-guided document analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月29日

查看全文
  • Amy Kia Cheen Liew,
  • Dalia Abdullah

摘要

Background

Dental trauma is common within school communities, yet access to timely care remains a challenge. Insurance coverage can reduce financial barriers and support coordinated responses. However, there are limited insights into how traumatic dental injuries (TDI) are covered and framed in Student Accident Insurance (SAI). This study applies framework-guided criteria to evaluate the content and framing of TDI in Malaysian SAI policies from 2023 to 2025.

Method

A qualitative document analysis was conducted on a purposive sample of SAI products using predefined criteria based on standard insurance policy elements and Entman’s theory of framing. Content analysis was used to classify policy elements, while frame analysis examined how TDI was conceptualized in brochures, disclosure sheets and policy wordings.

Results

Of the 48 registered insurance providers, five SAI products offering TDI coverage for full-time students aged approximately 3 to 21, mainly in kindergartens, primary or secondary schools, were identified. Plans with premiums ranging from Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 10 to 30 were offered. Plans priced at MYR 20 and 30 typically included a TDI sublimit capped at MYR 500. Dental appliances, routine check-ups and dentures were excluded in AIA, Generali and Tokio Marine policies. TDI was uniformly framed as accident-related, with Zurich uniquely framing it as bodily injury. Coverage was for school activities, excluding high-risk sports. Responsibility was variably assigned to parents, school or both. Most providers required initial treatment within 24 h, follow-up within 14 days and claims notice within 30 days of the accident. Zurich required earlier claims notice but allowed extended reimbursement.

Conclusion

Framework-guided criteria allow a systematic assessment of the different aspects through which SAI policies address and convey TDI coverage. Although Malaysian SAI policies offer generally affordable and standardised TDI coverage, variations in exclusions and framing highlight areas for policy improvement. Clear and consistent policy framing may contribute to strengthening community-based dental care by ensuring equitable and timely access to TDI management.