Scholarlink

Background <p>The aim of the study was to compare the hinge axis position (Ax) determined by virtual (VSP) versus conventional orthognathic surgery planning (CSP).</p> Methods <p>This retrospective cohort study included 320 (female/male = 204/116, median age 24.0 years) adult patients who received single- or two-jaw surgery originally planned using the CSP method and subsequently reevaluated using the VSP method. Three parameters (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = angle between the occlusal plane and reference plane, AxV = perpendicular distance between Ax and the occlusal plane, AxH = perpendicular distance between the upper incisor and AxV) for determining Ax were measured on cephalograms, both in VSP and CSP. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis.</p> Results <p>Both methods differed significantly with a bias of -1.83<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\circ\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (95%&#xa0;CI -2.04 to -1.62) for <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\alpha\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, -0.24&#xa0;mm (95%&#xa0;CI -0.41 to -0.08) for AxV and 0.46&#xa0;mm (95%&#xa0;CI 0.27 to 0.65) for AxH, with negative values indicating an overestimation by the CSP method. All differences were within the range considered as clinically acceptable.</p> Conclusions <p>There were statistically significant differences in all parameters; however, these differences were small and within the range generally considered to be clinically acceptable.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The difference in hinge axis position determined by virtual versus conventional planning in orthognathic surgery

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月29日

查看全文
  • Jonas Rosenbusch,
  • Moritz Kanemeier,
  • Thomas Stamm,
  • Claudius Middelberg,
  • Jonas Q. Schmid

摘要

Background

The aim of the study was to compare the hinge axis position (Ax) determined by virtual (VSP) versus conventional orthognathic surgery planning (CSP).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 320 (female/male = 204/116, median age 24.0 years) adult patients who received single- or two-jaw surgery originally planned using the CSP method and subsequently reevaluated using the VSP method. Three parameters ( \(\alpha\) = angle between the occlusal plane and reference plane, AxV = perpendicular distance between Ax and the occlusal plane, AxH = perpendicular distance between the upper incisor and AxV) for determining Ax were measured on cephalograms, both in VSP and CSP. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Both methods differed significantly with a bias of -1.83 \(^\circ\) (95% CI -2.04 to -1.62) for \(\alpha\) , -0.24 mm (95% CI -0.41 to -0.08) for AxV and 0.46 mm (95% CI 0.27 to 0.65) for AxH, with negative values indicating an overestimation by the CSP method. All differences were within the range considered as clinically acceptable.

Conclusions

There were statistically significant differences in all parameters; however, these differences were small and within the range generally considered to be clinically acceptable.