Scholarlink

Background <p>Accurate vertical dimension of rest (VDR) is critical in complete denture fabrication. Along with conventional phonetic and electromyographic (EMG) methods; cephalometric angular reconstruction (CAR) has recently been proposed as a reliable approach that minimizes reliance on patient dexterity. This in-vivo study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the CAR method by comparing it with conventional and electromyographic methods in determining VDR in edentulous subjects.</p> Materials and methods <p>Twenty completely edentulous patients were enrolled. For each patient, VDR was measured using phonetic, CAR, and EMG methods. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 23 using one-way ANOVA and independent <i>t</i>-tests. A sample size of 20 provided 80% power with an effect size of 0.8 at a significance level of 0.05. One month after denture insertion, patient satisfaction was assessed with a structured questionnaire.</p> Results <p>The mean VDR (cm) was 5.36 ± 0.61 for the conventional method, 5.35 ± 0.74 for CAR, and 5.64 ± 0.62 for EMG. Although the EMG method yielded slightly higher values, independent <i>t</i>-tests revealed no statistically significant differences between conventional and CAR (<i>p</i> = 0.962), conventional and EMG (<i>p</i> = 0.181), or CAR and EMG (<i>p</i> = 0.167). Patient satisfaction scores indicated favorable outcomes across all groups.</p> Conclusion <p>There was no statistically significant difference among the three methods, confirming that CAR can serve as a viable alternative to conventional and EMG approaches.</p> Clinical implications <p>The CAR method may be particularly useful for patients with neuromuscular issues, psychological challenges, or limited cooperation during traditional VDR recording.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Validating cephalometric angular reconstruction for determining vertical dimension in edentulous patients

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月21日

查看全文
  • Aishwarya Mahajan,
  • Vivek Vivek,
  • Anuj K. Shukla,
  • Chandana Nair,
  • Mudita Chaturvedi,
  • Ghazala Suleman,
  • Tushar Vitthalrao Bhagat,
  • Mohammed A. Al-Qarni,
  • Nishant K.,
  • Vishwanath Gurumurthy,
  • Saurabh Chaturvedi

摘要

Background

Accurate vertical dimension of rest (VDR) is critical in complete denture fabrication. Along with conventional phonetic and electromyographic (EMG) methods; cephalometric angular reconstruction (CAR) has recently been proposed as a reliable approach that minimizes reliance on patient dexterity. This in-vivo study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the CAR method by comparing it with conventional and electromyographic methods in determining VDR in edentulous subjects.

Materials and methods

Twenty completely edentulous patients were enrolled. For each patient, VDR was measured using phonetic, CAR, and EMG methods. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 23 using one-way ANOVA and independent t-tests. A sample size of 20 provided 80% power with an effect size of 0.8 at a significance level of 0.05. One month after denture insertion, patient satisfaction was assessed with a structured questionnaire.

Results

The mean VDR (cm) was 5.36 ± 0.61 for the conventional method, 5.35 ± 0.74 for CAR, and 5.64 ± 0.62 for EMG. Although the EMG method yielded slightly higher values, independent t-tests revealed no statistically significant differences between conventional and CAR (p = 0.962), conventional and EMG (p = 0.181), or CAR and EMG (p = 0.167). Patient satisfaction scores indicated favorable outcomes across all groups.

Conclusion

There was no statistically significant difference among the three methods, confirming that CAR can serve as a viable alternative to conventional and EMG approaches.

Clinical implications

The CAR method may be particularly useful for patients with neuromuscular issues, psychological challenges, or limited cooperation during traditional VDR recording.