Background <p>This retrospective study aimed to investigate the accuracy of robot-assisted implant surgery and identify the factors influencing it.</p> Methods <p>Patients with single or multiple missing teeth were enrolled in the robot-assisted implant surgery. The patients underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using a marker. Virtual implant placement and a drilling sequence were planned prior to surgery. The robotic arm automatically performed the implant osteotomy and placement under the surgeon’s supervision. A postoperative CBCT scan was performed to evaluate deviations between the planned and placed implants.</p> Results <p>A total of 152 implants were successfully inserted into the jawbones of 100 patients without any adverse surgical events. However, two implants were observed to fail early (&lt; 1 month). An overall coronal deviation of 0.51 ± 0.02&#xa0;mm, apical deviation of 0.53 ± 0.02&#xa0;mm, and angular deviation of 1.05 ± 0.05° were observed. The angular deviation of the first nearest site in the free-end position was significantly lower than that of the second or third nearest site (<i>p</i> = 0.043). Additionally, the coronal and apical deviations were significantly decreased with the accumulation of clinical experience (<i>p</i> = 0.014 and <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). However, no significant differences were found among jaw location, position, implant diameter, or length (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p> Conclusions <p>Robot-assisted dental implant surgery resulted in an accurate placement performance. Further studies are required to clarify long-term effects.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Accuracy of robot-assisted dental implant surgery and its clinical influencing factors: a retrospective case series of 100 patients

  • Chengpeng Lv,
  • Bowen Qin,
  • Longlong He,
  • Boya Xu,
  • Yiqun Wu,
  • Zhe Li,
  • Liangzhi Du

摘要

Background

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the accuracy of robot-assisted implant surgery and identify the factors influencing it.

Methods

Patients with single or multiple missing teeth were enrolled in the robot-assisted implant surgery. The patients underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) using a marker. Virtual implant placement and a drilling sequence were planned prior to surgery. The robotic arm automatically performed the implant osteotomy and placement under the surgeon’s supervision. A postoperative CBCT scan was performed to evaluate deviations between the planned and placed implants.

Results

A total of 152 implants were successfully inserted into the jawbones of 100 patients without any adverse surgical events. However, two implants were observed to fail early (< 1 month). An overall coronal deviation of 0.51 ± 0.02 mm, apical deviation of 0.53 ± 0.02 mm, and angular deviation of 1.05 ± 0.05° were observed. The angular deviation of the first nearest site in the free-end position was significantly lower than that of the second or third nearest site (p = 0.043). Additionally, the coronal and apical deviations were significantly decreased with the accumulation of clinical experience (p = 0.014 and p = 0.001, respectively). However, no significant differences were found among jaw location, position, implant diameter, or length (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Robot-assisted dental implant surgery resulted in an accurate placement performance. Further studies are required to clarify long-term effects.