Scholarlink

Background <p>This study compares the residual stress distribution and stress-release deformation of root-analogue implants (RAIs) and traditional threaded cylindrical implants to assess their clinical applicability and optimization.</p> Methods <p>Three implant types (solid RAIs, mesh RAIs, and traditional threaded implants) were analyzed using contour cutting and finite element analysis to evaluate stress distribution and deformation trends after stress release.</p> Results <p>RAIs exhibited lower tensile and compressive stresses than threaded implants (T1: 26&#xa0;MPa vs. 48&#xa0;MPa, T2: 18&#xa0;MPa vs. 74&#xa0;MPa), but showed greater displacement (T1: 0.02&#xa0;mm, T2: 0.012&#xa0;mm, T3: 0.0025&#xa0;mm), mainly in the apical region.</p> Conclusions <p>RAIs offer advantages in stress distribution but require further optimization to address deformation. Future research should focus on improving material selection and manufacturing processes to enhance implant stability and long-term success.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of residual stress distribution between root-analogue implant and threaded cylindrical implant

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月3日

查看全文
  • Bingjing Zhao,
  • Jizhen Liu,
  • Xiaoyan Li,
  • Changkui Liu,
  • Jianbo Gao,
  • Min Hu

摘要

Background

This study compares the residual stress distribution and stress-release deformation of root-analogue implants (RAIs) and traditional threaded cylindrical implants to assess their clinical applicability and optimization.

Methods

Three implant types (solid RAIs, mesh RAIs, and traditional threaded implants) were analyzed using contour cutting and finite element analysis to evaluate stress distribution and deformation trends after stress release.

Results

RAIs exhibited lower tensile and compressive stresses than threaded implants (T1: 26 MPa vs. 48 MPa, T2: 18 MPa vs. 74 MPa), but showed greater displacement (T1: 0.02 mm, T2: 0.012 mm, T3: 0.0025 mm), mainly in the apical region.

Conclusions

RAIs offer advantages in stress distribution but require further optimization to address deformation. Future research should focus on improving material selection and manufacturing processes to enhance implant stability and long-term success.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.