Background Achieving optimal color control in chairside CAD/CAM ultra-thin veneers, remains a significant challenge for dental clinicians and technicians. This study aims to investigate the effect of ultra-thin CAD/CAM medium translucency (MT) lithium disilicate veneers and tooth-colored resin substrates on final tooth shade and whiteness. Materials and methods Disk-shaped ceramic veneers (IPS e.max CAD MT, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with a thickness of 0.3 mm were fabricated in BL2, BL3, BL4, B1, A1, A2, and A3 shades. Additionally, 4-mm thick resin substrates (Tetric N-Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) were prepared in A2, A3, A3.5, and A4 shades to simulate tooth-colored substrates. Veneer-resin composites were prepared by combining veneer specimens and resin substrates. Color coordinates of tooth-colored resin substrates (R), veneer-resin composites (C) and the shade guide tabs (G) were obtained using a spectroradiometer. Color differences of ΔE00(C-R), ΔE00(C-G) and ΔE00(R-G) were then calculated with the CIEDE2000 formula. The initial and final shades were considered matched when ΔE00(R-G) or ΔE00(C-G) was clinically acceptable or minimal. Additionally, whiteness differences (ΔWID) between R and C specimens were recorded. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Tukey HSD. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results Both the shades of resin substrates and veneer shades had significant effects on ΔE00(C-R) and ΔWID (p < 0.001), while no interaction effects were observed (p > 0.05). They increased with darker resin substrates and lighter veneers, except for no significant differences among BL4, B1, and A1 veneers. The largest color difference was observed for BL2 veneers on A4 substrates (ΔE00(C-R) = 6.9 ± 0.3, ΔWID = 19.0 ± 1.5), while the smallest occurred with A3 veneers on A2 substrates (ΔE00(C-R) = 2.4 ± 0.6, ΔWID = 5.6 ± 1.0). Final tooth shades were maximally transformed to lighter shades, with A2, A3, A3.5, and A4 substrates shifting to 2M1, 2L1.5, 2R2.5, and 3L1.5, respectively. Conclusions Both resin substrates and veneer shades significantly influence final tooth shade and whiteness independently. 0.3-mm thick CAD/CAM MT lithium disilicate veneers produce substantial shade and whiteness transformations, making them effective for shade enhancement. Graphical Abstract

Final shade and whiteness: impact of various ultra-thin CAD/CAM veneers and tooth-colored resin substrates

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年4月8日

查看全文

Yinghui Wang,
Xia Wei,
Linjuan Gao,
Dingkun Liu,
Xing Chen,
Liujun Lin,
Yu Pan,
Hao Yu,
Guang Hong,
Hui Cheng

摘要

Background

Achieving optimal color control in chairside CAD/CAM ultra-thin veneers, remains a significant challenge for dental clinicians and technicians. This study aims to investigate the effect of ultra-thin CAD/CAM medium translucency (MT) lithium disilicate veneers and tooth-colored resin substrates on final tooth shade and whiteness.

Materials and methods

Disk-shaped ceramic veneers (IPS e.max CAD MT, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with a thickness of 0.3 mm were fabricated in BL2, BL3, BL4, B1, A1, A2, and A3 shades. Additionally, 4-mm thick resin substrates (Tetric N-Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) were prepared in A2, A3, A3.5, and A4 shades to simulate tooth-colored substrates. Veneer-resin composites were prepared by combining veneer specimens and resin substrates. Color coordinates of tooth-colored resin substrates (R), veneer-resin composites (C) and the shade guide tabs (G) were obtained using a spectroradiometer. Color differences of ΔE_00(C-R), ΔE_00(C-G) and ΔE_00(R-G) were then calculated with the CIEDE2000 formula. The initial and final shades were considered matched when ΔE_00(R-G) or ΔE_00(C-G) was clinically acceptable or minimal. Additionally, whiteness differences (ΔWI_D) between R and C specimens were recorded. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Tukey HSD. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Both the shades of resin substrates and veneer shades had significant effects on ΔE_00(C-R) and ΔWI_D (p < 0.001), while no interaction effects were observed (p > 0.05). They increased with darker resin substrates and lighter veneers, except for no significant differences among BL4, B1, and A1 veneers. The largest color difference was observed for BL2 veneers on A4 substrates (ΔE_00(C-R) = 6.9 ± 0.3, ΔWI_D = 19.0 ± 1.5), while the smallest occurred with A3 veneers on A2 substrates (ΔE_00(C-R) = 2.4 ± 0.6, ΔWI_D = 5.6 ± 1.0). Final tooth shades were maximally transformed to lighter shades, with A2, A3, A3.5, and A4 substrates shifting to 2M1, 2L1.5, 2R2.5, and 3L1.5, respectively.

Conclusions

Both resin substrates and veneer shades significantly influence final tooth shade and whiteness independently. 0.3-mm thick CAD/CAM MT lithium disilicate veneers produce substantial shade and whiteness transformations, making them effective for shade enhancement.

Graphical Abstract