Scholarlink

Background <p>Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a life-threatening complication after pancreatic resection. Although interventional radiology has become the preferred first-line treatment for delayed arterial hemorrhage, some patients still require surgical salvage. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment pathways, and outcomes of severe PPH requiring emergency intervention.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy at our institution between April 2009 and October 2025. Severe PPH was defined according to the criteria of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Clinical characteristics, timing of onset, associated postoperative complications, treatment pathways, and outcomes were evaluated.</p> Results <p>Among 750 pancreatectomies, 16 patients developed severe PPH requiring emergency intervention, yielding an overall incidence of 2.1%. The incidence was 2.7% after pancreaticoduodenectomy and 0.9% after distal pancreatectomy. Four patients had early severe grade B hemorrhage and 12 had late severe grade C hemorrhage. Initial treatment consisted of surgery first in 3 patients, interventional radiology only in 10 patients, and interventional radiology followed by surgery in 3 patients. Pseudoaneurysm was identified in 7 patients. Early severe PPH was categorized as technical failure, whereas late severe PPH was associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, pseudoaneurysm, and other local postoperative complications.</p> Conclusions <p>Severe PPH is a heterogeneous clinical entity requiring individualized management. Interventional radiology is the principal first-line treatment for delayed arterial hemorrhage, but endovascular hemostasis alone may not always achieve definitive clinical rescue, and selected patients still require prompt surgical salvage.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Management of severe postpancreatectomy hemorrhage requiring emergency intervention: treatment pathways and surgical salvage in a single-center case series

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月27日

查看全文
  • Hajime Imamura,
  • Tomohiko Adachi,
  • Ayaka Kinoshita,
  • Hideki Ishimaru,
  • Yuki Nunoshita,
  • Kouki Kurotaki,
  • Shun Nakamura,
  • Shinichiro Ogawa,
  • Baglan Askeyev,
  • Ayaka Satoh,
  • Kazushige Migita,
  • Kunihito Matsuguma,
  • Takashi Hamada,
  • Takanobu Hara,
  • Hajime Matsushima,
  • Masato Fujiyoshi,
  • Susumu Eguchi

摘要

Background

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a life-threatening complication after pancreatic resection. Although interventional radiology has become the preferred first-line treatment for delayed arterial hemorrhage, some patients still require surgical salvage. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, treatment pathways, and outcomes of severe PPH requiring emergency intervention.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent pancreatectomy at our institution between April 2009 and October 2025. Severe PPH was defined according to the criteria of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Clinical characteristics, timing of onset, associated postoperative complications, treatment pathways, and outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Among 750 pancreatectomies, 16 patients developed severe PPH requiring emergency intervention, yielding an overall incidence of 2.1%. The incidence was 2.7% after pancreaticoduodenectomy and 0.9% after distal pancreatectomy. Four patients had early severe grade B hemorrhage and 12 had late severe grade C hemorrhage. Initial treatment consisted of surgery first in 3 patients, interventional radiology only in 10 patients, and interventional radiology followed by surgery in 3 patients. Pseudoaneurysm was identified in 7 patients. Early severe PPH was categorized as technical failure, whereas late severe PPH was associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leakage, pseudoaneurysm, and other local postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Severe PPH is a heterogeneous clinical entity requiring individualized management. Interventional radiology is the principal first-line treatment for delayed arterial hemorrhage, but endovascular hemostasis alone may not always achieve definitive clinical rescue, and selected patients still require prompt surgical salvage.