Background <p>Conventional surgical instruments are often designed based on assumptions regarding hand size and grip strength that may not reflect the physical characteristics of all surgeons. Circular staplers require substantial manual force during firing and may be associated with perceived ergonomic burden and psychological stress during anastomosis. Powered circular staplers have been introduced to reduce manual effort; however, limited information is available regarding surgeons’ subjective experiences with these devices. This exploratory study aimed to examine perceived ergonomic and psychological experiences related to powered circular stapler use among female gastrointestinal surgeons in Japan.</p> Methods <p>This small exploratory cross-sectional survey used an anonymous web-based survey conducted between January and March 2021. Female gastrointestinal surgeons in Japan with experience using powered circular staplers were recruited through professional networks using a snowball sampling approach. The survey focused on self-reported perceptions of ergonomic workload, psychological stress during stapler firing, and usability impressions of powered circular staplers. Given the exploratory design and limited sample size, analyses were descriptive only and no inferential statistics were applied.</p> Results <p>Twenty-five female surgeons responded to the survey. Thirteen respondents (52%) reported that some surgical instruments were too large for their hands, and 20 surgeons (80%) perceived strength limitations with some devices. With conventional manual circular staplers, most participants (24/25, 96%) required both hands to fire the device and reported stress or perceived instability during firing.</p> <p>Among respondents with experience using powered circular staplers, many reported that the devices were easier to handle and less stressful. Sixteen surgeons (64%) reported perceived single-hand operability, and a similar proportion reported perceived improvements in procedural stability. Qualitative comments indicated subjective impressions of reduced physical effort and anxiety.</p> Conclusions <p>In this small exploratory survey, powered circular staplers were perceived by female gastrointestinal surgeons as being easier to handle and less stressful to use during anastomosis. These findings reflect self-reported perceptions rather than objective ergonomic or clinical outcomes, and causal relationships cannot be established. These findings are hypothesis-generating and suggest that further studies incorporating objective ergonomic measurements and broader surgeon populations are warranted.</p>