Background <p>Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has proven to be a safe and effective choice for long-standing weight loss, associated complications have been described. Among them, marginal ulcer (MU) has been recognized as one of the more significant postoperative complications. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has currently been the third most common procedure overall in the world. Similar to RYGB, concerns have emerged for MU risk after OAGB. This study aimed to compare the incidence of MU after RYGB versus OAGB.</p> Methods <p>This is a cross-sectional study that included 62 adult patients who underwent RYGB or OAGB and were followed up for a period of two years. The included patients underwent a complete general examination and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.</p> Results <p>The prevalence of MU in RYGB patients was 19.4%, whereas in OAGB patients, it was markedly lower at 3.2%, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.045). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of diabetes and the type of surgery (RYGB) were significant predictors for MU.</p> Conclusion <p>Marginal ulcers occurred at a relatively high rate after bypass surgery. OAGB demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of MUs compared to RYGB. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the RYGB procedure were significant predictors of MU after adjusting for the confounding factors.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Incidence of marginal ulcer after one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study

  • Ahmed Abdelsalam,
  • Ahmed Fahmy,
  • Ahmed Saqr,
  • Sherkawi Elsayed,
  • Ahmed Mohamed Salah Eldden Othman Elansary

摘要

Background

Although Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has proven to be a safe and effective choice for long-standing weight loss, associated complications have been described. Among them, marginal ulcer (MU) has been recognized as one of the more significant postoperative complications. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has currently been the third most common procedure overall in the world. Similar to RYGB, concerns have emerged for MU risk after OAGB. This study aimed to compare the incidence of MU after RYGB versus OAGB.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study that included 62 adult patients who underwent RYGB or OAGB and were followed up for a period of two years. The included patients underwent a complete general examination and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Results

The prevalence of MU in RYGB patients was 19.4%, whereas in OAGB patients, it was markedly lower at 3.2%, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.045). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of diabetes and the type of surgery (RYGB) were significant predictors for MU.

Conclusion

Marginal ulcers occurred at a relatively high rate after bypass surgery. OAGB demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of MUs compared to RYGB. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and the RYGB procedure were significant predictors of MU after adjusting for the confounding factors.