Scholarlink

Background <p>Despite cultural preferences for organ preservation in East Asia, choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery (CGPS) remains controversial given high recurrence rates. This study objectively quantified the increased technical complexity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for recurrent cholecystolithiasis after prior CGPS using the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18).</p> Methods <p>In this propensity-matched study (1:1, <i>n</i> = 220) conducted between 2020 and 2025, patients requiring LC due to recurrent cholecystolithiasis after prior CGPS were compared with patients with primary cholecystolithiasis undergoing LC. Investigators matched groups for TG18 severity grading, BMI, and biliary anomalies. Two blinded surgeons assessed the intraoperative findings using TG18 Delphi scoring (7-point scale). Primary outcomes included difficulty scores, critical view of safety (CVS) achievement, and bile duct injury.</p> Results <p>The CGPS group demonstrated significantly higher median TG18 scores (34 [IQR 30–39] vs. 21 [18–24]; adjusted mean difference: Δ 14.0 points, 95% CI: 11.2–16.8; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), primarily due to fibrotic adhesions: Calot’s triangle dense fibrosis (49.1% vs. 6.4%), partial scarring (21.8% vs. 0.9%), and diffuse scarring (15.5% vs. 0%; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Surgeons achieved CVS less frequently in the CGPS group (83.6% vs. 98.2%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). TG18 scores &gt; 25 predicted a fivefold increased conversion risk (aOR = 4.9, 95% CI: 2.3–10.6).</p> Conclusions <p>Prior CGPS induces irreversible fibrosis that significantly increases reoperative difficulty (Δ 14 TG18 points), highlighting the need for careful patient selection in organ-preserving procedures. Definitive management with primary cholecystectomy remains the gold standard.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gallbladder preservation: TG18 Delphi score quantifies surgical difficulty

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月26日

查看全文
  • Juxian Song,
  • Qianlong Wu,
  • Weikun Wu,
  • Xing Wang,
  • Hulin Wang

摘要

Background

Despite cultural preferences for organ preservation in East Asia, choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving surgery (CGPS) remains controversial given high recurrence rates. This study objectively quantified the increased technical complexity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for recurrent cholecystolithiasis after prior CGPS using the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18).

Methods

In this propensity-matched study (1:1, n = 220) conducted between 2020 and 2025, patients requiring LC due to recurrent cholecystolithiasis after prior CGPS were compared with patients with primary cholecystolithiasis undergoing LC. Investigators matched groups for TG18 severity grading, BMI, and biliary anomalies. Two blinded surgeons assessed the intraoperative findings using TG18 Delphi scoring (7-point scale). Primary outcomes included difficulty scores, critical view of safety (CVS) achievement, and bile duct injury.

Results

The CGPS group demonstrated significantly higher median TG18 scores (34 [IQR 30–39] vs. 21 [18–24]; adjusted mean difference: Δ 14.0 points, 95% CI: 11.2–16.8; p < 0.001), primarily due to fibrotic adhesions: Calot’s triangle dense fibrosis (49.1% vs. 6.4%), partial scarring (21.8% vs. 0.9%), and diffuse scarring (15.5% vs. 0%; all p < 0.001). Surgeons achieved CVS less frequently in the CGPS group (83.6% vs. 98.2%, p < 0.001). TG18 scores > 25 predicted a fivefold increased conversion risk (aOR = 4.9, 95% CI: 2.3–10.6).

Conclusions

Prior CGPS induces irreversible fibrosis that significantly increases reoperative difficulty (Δ 14 TG18 points), highlighting the need for careful patient selection in organ-preserving procedures. Definitive management with primary cholecystectomy remains the gold standard.