Background <p>Our understanding of the impact of chronic ankle instability (CAI) on dynamic postural stability remains limited, primarily due to the absence of reliable and accurate assessment tools. This study aimed to explore two aspects of dynamic postural stability: (1) differences in the dynamic postural stability index (DPSI) and its directional components between athletes with CAI and those with stable ankles; and (2) the impact of jump direction (forward vs. lateral) on these indices across both groups.</p> Methods <p>We recruited fifteen athletes with CAI and fifteen healthy athletes as controls. The injured side of CAI subjects and the matched side of controls performed forward and lateral single-leg landing tasks (from a 20&#xa0;cm height onto a force platform, three repetitions). DPSI and its directional indices (anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical) were calculated according to Wikstrom’s method.</p> Results <p>Athletes with CAI demonstrated significantly greater anterior-posterior stability index (APSI) scores (F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 9.864, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.261) and vertical stability index (VSI) scores (F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 6.193, <i>p</i> = 0.019, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.181) during the forward landing task, and significantly greater medial-lateral stability index (MLSI) scores (F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 10.144, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.266) during the lateral landing task. APSI (CAI: F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 42.616, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.603; CON: F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 6.229, <i>p</i> = 0.019, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.182) and DPSI (CAI: F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 13.062, <i>p</i> = 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.318; CON: F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 9.673, <i>p</i> = 0.004, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.257) scores revealed a significant difference between directions in both groups. MLSI scores exhibited a significant increase in the lateral direction in the CAI group (F<sub>(1,28)</sub> = 18.289, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, η<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub> = 0.395).</p> Conclusions <p>Athletes with CAI demonstrated dynamic stability deficits, and the direction of the jump can affect dynamic postural stability in the sagittal and frontal planes.</p> Trial registration <p>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200062443, Registered 7 August 2022.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Dynamic postural stability indices in athletes: a case-control study on chronic ankle instability during multi-directional landing assessments

  • Xiaoya Zhang,
  • Bin Ruan,
  • Qi Gao

摘要

Background

Our understanding of the impact of chronic ankle instability (CAI) on dynamic postural stability remains limited, primarily due to the absence of reliable and accurate assessment tools. This study aimed to explore two aspects of dynamic postural stability: (1) differences in the dynamic postural stability index (DPSI) and its directional components between athletes with CAI and those with stable ankles; and (2) the impact of jump direction (forward vs. lateral) on these indices across both groups.

Methods

We recruited fifteen athletes with CAI and fifteen healthy athletes as controls. The injured side of CAI subjects and the matched side of controls performed forward and lateral single-leg landing tasks (from a 20 cm height onto a force platform, three repetitions). DPSI and its directional indices (anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and vertical) were calculated according to Wikstrom’s method.

Results

Athletes with CAI demonstrated significantly greater anterior-posterior stability index (APSI) scores (F(1,28) = 9.864, p = 0.004, η2p = 0.261) and vertical stability index (VSI) scores (F(1,28) = 6.193, p = 0.019, η2p = 0.181) during the forward landing task, and significantly greater medial-lateral stability index (MLSI) scores (F(1,28) = 10.144, p = 0.004, η2p = 0.266) during the lateral landing task. APSI (CAI: F(1,28) = 42.616, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.603; CON: F(1,28) = 6.229, p = 0.019, η2p = 0.182) and DPSI (CAI: F(1,28) = 13.062, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.318; CON: F(1,28) = 9.673, p = 0.004, η2p = 0.257) scores revealed a significant difference between directions in both groups. MLSI scores exhibited a significant increase in the lateral direction in the CAI group (F(1,28) = 18.289, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.395).

Conclusions

Athletes with CAI demonstrated dynamic stability deficits, and the direction of the jump can affect dynamic postural stability in the sagittal and frontal planes.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200062443, Registered 7 August 2022.