Purpose <p>This study aims to develop a computational model to assess the cumulative probability of meniscal failure in the knee joint during running.</p> Methods <p>The knee joint forces of twelve male participants were measured while running at speeds of 9&#xa0;km/h, 12&#xa0;km/h, and 15&#xa0;km/h. These forces were used as boundary conditions in a finite element model. The proportion of high-stress elements in the meniscus during the support phase was calculated, and a Weibull distribution-based failure model was used to compute the cumulative injury probabilities of the meniscus over 360&#xa0;days at the three running speeds.</p> Results <p>Running speed had a significant main effect on this ratio(p = 0.041, F = 3.393, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.117), the ratio during the stance phase at 15&#xa0;km/h was greater than at 9&#xa0;km/h(<i>p</i> = 0.036, F = 5.402, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 1.248), but this difference was not statistically significant when compared to 12&#xa0;km/h(<i>p</i> = 0.513, F = 1.068, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.224); similarly, there was no significant difference between 9&#xa0;km/h and 12&#xa0;km/h(p = 0.139, F = 1.335, Cohen’s <i>d</i> = 0.921).</p> Conclusions <p>Faster running speeds result in higher knee joint reaction forces, however, the probability of meniscal failure is lower. The risk of meniscal failure is more strongly associated with the frequency of stress applications than with the magnitude of the stress itself. Slower running speeds require more gait cycles to complete the same running distance, thereby prolonging loading duration and increasing the number of stress applications. </p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effects of running speed on the probability of meniscal failure in the knee joint: based on finite element analysis and the Weibull failure model

  • Yuanchao Li,
  • Zhiming Pan,
  • Kexing Zhang,
  • Yanan He,
  • Chen Yang,
  • Chunlong Liu

摘要

Purpose

This study aims to develop a computational model to assess the cumulative probability of meniscal failure in the knee joint during running.

Methods

The knee joint forces of twelve male participants were measured while running at speeds of 9 km/h, 12 km/h, and 15 km/h. These forces were used as boundary conditions in a finite element model. The proportion of high-stress elements in the meniscus during the support phase was calculated, and a Weibull distribution-based failure model was used to compute the cumulative injury probabilities of the meniscus over 360 days at the three running speeds.

Results

Running speed had a significant main effect on this ratio(p = 0.041, F = 3.393, ηp2 = 0.117), the ratio during the stance phase at 15 km/h was greater than at 9 km/h(p = 0.036, F = 5.402, Cohen’s d = 1.248), but this difference was not statistically significant when compared to 12 km/h(p = 0.513, F = 1.068, Cohen’s d = 0.224); similarly, there was no significant difference between 9 km/h and 12 km/h(p = 0.139, F = 1.335, Cohen’s d = 0.921).

Conclusions

Faster running speeds result in higher knee joint reaction forces, however, the probability of meniscal failure is lower. The risk of meniscal failure is more strongly associated with the frequency of stress applications than with the magnitude of the stress itself. Slower running speeds require more gait cycles to complete the same running distance, thereby prolonging loading duration and increasing the number of stress applications.