Scholarlink

Background <p>Managing femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young adults remains a significant clinical dilemma. No single internal fixation method has demonstrated clear superiority. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of FNFs in young adults treated with femoral neck locking plate (FNLP) or conventional partially-threaded 6.5&#xa0;mm multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCCS).</p> Methods <p>A randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) study was conducted on 74 patients to assess FNLP and MCCS in management of FNFs in young adults in Sohag university hospital between October 2022 and October 2024. The outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), weight-bearing timelines, radiographic union times, and complication rates.</p> Results <p>FNLP demonstrated superior functional outcomes with significantly higher HHS scores compared to MCCS. Patients treated with FNLP achieved earlier partial and full weight-bearing (<i>p</i> &lt;.001) and faster radiographic union times (<i>p</i> =.012), indicating better biomechanical stability. MCCS had a significantly shorter operative time at (49.3 ± 3.5&#xa0;min) compared to the FNLP group at (62.3 ± 9.9&#xa0;min), (<i>p</i> =.042). Complication rates, including femoral neck shortening, avascular necrosis, and infection, were comparable between the two groups.</p> Conclusion <p>FNLP is a more effective fixation method for young adults with FNFs, offering faster functional recovery and improved radiographic outcomes. MCCS demonstrated significant shorter operative time which is a potential advantage especially in resources-constrained settings. Complication rates were similar between FNLP and MCCS, making MCCS a viable option in selected cases based on fracture severity, surgical expertise, and resources availability.</p> Level of evidence <p>Level II therapeutic: prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.</p> Trial registration <p>The trial was retrospectively registered at 27 November, 2023 at <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov">www.clinicaltrials.gov</a> (Trial Registration Number: NCT06162637).</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Femoral neck locking plate versus multiple cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in young adults: a randomized controlled trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月18日

查看全文
  • Yasser Ahmed Othman,
  • Abdelrahman Hafez Khalefa,
  • Islam Mohammed Ahmed,
  • Khalaf Fathy Elsayed Ahmed

摘要

Background

Managing femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young adults remains a significant clinical dilemma. No single internal fixation method has demonstrated clear superiority. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of FNFs in young adults treated with femoral neck locking plate (FNLP) or conventional partially-threaded 6.5 mm multiple cannulated cancellous screws (MCCS).

Methods

A randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) study was conducted on 74 patients to assess FNLP and MCCS in management of FNFs in young adults in Sohag university hospital between October 2022 and October 2024. The outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), weight-bearing timelines, radiographic union times, and complication rates.

Results

FNLP demonstrated superior functional outcomes with significantly higher HHS scores compared to MCCS. Patients treated with FNLP achieved earlier partial and full weight-bearing (p <.001) and faster radiographic union times (p =.012), indicating better biomechanical stability. MCCS had a significantly shorter operative time at (49.3 ± 3.5 min) compared to the FNLP group at (62.3 ± 9.9 min), (p =.042). Complication rates, including femoral neck shortening, avascular necrosis, and infection, were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion

FNLP is a more effective fixation method for young adults with FNFs, offering faster functional recovery and improved radiographic outcomes. MCCS demonstrated significant shorter operative time which is a potential advantage especially in resources-constrained settings. Complication rates were similar between FNLP and MCCS, making MCCS a viable option in selected cases based on fracture severity, surgical expertise, and resources availability.

Level of evidence

Level II therapeutic: prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered at 27 November, 2023 at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Trial Registration Number: NCT06162637).