Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rural areas face significant barriers to care and management of their disease. This study assessed the feasibility of remote ILD care using virtual multidisciplinary discussions (MDD) for accurate diagnosis and home-based spirometry for ILD management in rural Virginia.</p> Methods <p>A prospective feasibility study was conducted involving patients with suspected ILD living in rural Virginia. Participants were enrolled through their community pulmonary provider for discussion in the remote Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) MDD. Following MDD recommendations were provided by the group and distributed back to their community physicians. These recommendations included additional diagnostic work-up as well as suggestions in adjustment in management. Additionally, subjects were also screened for home spirometry testing. The subjects were trained on the NuvoAir home spirometry system and followed for 6 months Results were then compared to in clinic spirometry at 3 and 6 months.</p> Results <p>Remote MDD discussions led to a change in diagnosis of 65% of subjects had a consensus diagnosis following MDD, including 47% of subjects with a change in preMDD diagnosis. For the 35% of subjects with determined “Unclassifiable ILD” referring physicians were provided additional diagnostic recommendations. Home spirometry was found to have excellent agreement with FVC measurement as compared to in clinic spirometry. Additionally, patient experience with home testing was strongly positive.</p> Conclusion <p>The multimodal model of remote MDD and spirometric monitoring with home devices was determined to be acceptable and feasible for rural Virginian patients and their community pulmonary physicians. The benefit of this combination suggests an increase in diagnostic accuracy while providing support for rural providers on additional diagnostic testing and management for these patients as well as decreasing the patient burden of continued monitoring of these progressive diseases. However, additional exploration into the reasons for low referrals needs to be explored before this program could be further implemented.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Remote multidisciplinary diagnostic discussion and spirometry for ILD patients in rural Virginia

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月28日

查看全文
  • Jon B. Mullholand,
  • Robert Hosse,
  • Thomas Rusher,
  • Madeline Helwig,
  • Leila Rezai Gharai,
  • Kerri A. Johannson,
  • Apostolos Perelas,
  • Peter Jackson

摘要

Introduction

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in rural areas face significant barriers to care and management of their disease. This study assessed the feasibility of remote ILD care using virtual multidisciplinary discussions (MDD) for accurate diagnosis and home-based spirometry for ILD management in rural Virginia.

Methods

A prospective feasibility study was conducted involving patients with suspected ILD living in rural Virginia. Participants were enrolled through their community pulmonary provider for discussion in the remote Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) MDD. Following MDD recommendations were provided by the group and distributed back to their community physicians. These recommendations included additional diagnostic work-up as well as suggestions in adjustment in management. Additionally, subjects were also screened for home spirometry testing. The subjects were trained on the NuvoAir home spirometry system and followed for 6 months Results were then compared to in clinic spirometry at 3 and 6 months.

Results

Remote MDD discussions led to a change in diagnosis of 65% of subjects had a consensus diagnosis following MDD, including 47% of subjects with a change in preMDD diagnosis. For the 35% of subjects with determined “Unclassifiable ILD” referring physicians were provided additional diagnostic recommendations. Home spirometry was found to have excellent agreement with FVC measurement as compared to in clinic spirometry. Additionally, patient experience with home testing was strongly positive.

Conclusion

The multimodal model of remote MDD and spirometric monitoring with home devices was determined to be acceptable and feasible for rural Virginian patients and their community pulmonary physicians. The benefit of this combination suggests an increase in diagnostic accuracy while providing support for rural providers on additional diagnostic testing and management for these patients as well as decreasing the patient burden of continued monitoring of these progressive diseases. However, additional exploration into the reasons for low referrals needs to be explored before this program could be further implemented.