Scholarlink

Background <p>Informal sector workers in low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately vulnerable to climate shocks due to precarious livelihoods, limited social protection, and structural inequities. In Pakistan, the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) and one-time cash grants are the primary safety nets, yet their contribution to climate resilience remains underexplored. This study explored how BISP and emergency cash assistance shape the dimensions of climate resilience among informal sector workers in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, with particular attention to access barriers, gendered power relations, informal coping strategies, and climate sensitivity of programme design.</p> Methods <p>A qualitative phenomenological design was applied between April and June 2025 across three climatic zones of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: north, central and south. A multistage purposive sampling strategy was used to ensure diversity across geography, occupation, gender and urban–rural residence. Thirty in-depth interviews were conducted with informal workers aged 18&#xa0;years and above who had been directly affected by a climate shock in the past five years. Six focus group discussions were also conducted with 36 institutional stakeholders from social protection, disaster management, health and local government sectors. Data were collected in Pashto and Urdu, transcribed, translated into English and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis within a descriptive phenomenological orientation.</p> Results <p>Thematic analysis identified five themes and ten sub-themes: (1) Inadequate and inflexible financial support (static assistance amid dynamic crises; debt, instability, and recovery fatigue); (2) Barriers to accessing social protection (digital gaps and bureaucratic complexity; cultural and logistical barriers); (3) Gendered constraints and local power structures (aid without autonomy; gatekeeping and informal exploitation); (4) Everyday adaptation and informal resilience (social networks and mutual aid; flexible routines and low-tech innovations); and (5) Towards responsive and climate-sensitive aid (disaster-specific, localised relief; early warning and infrastructure gaps).</p> Conclusions <p>Pakistan’s social protection systems provide critical but limited relief against climate shocks for informal workers. To build long-term resilience, reforms are required to make these systems climate-sensitive, adaptive, and gender-transformative. The findings offer policy lessons for other LMICs seeking to strengthen social protection as a pathway to climate resilience.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Social protection and climate resilience among informal workers in Pakistan: a qualitative study of the Benazir income support programme in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月29日

查看全文
  • Maria Ishaq Khattak,
  • Saad Ishaq Khattak,
  • Hafiza Sumayya Shaukat,
  • Syeda Saira Bokhari,
  • Khalid Rehman,
  • Nauman Arif,
  • Abdullah Alsabaani,
  • Zia ul Haq,
  • Hannah Maria Jennings

摘要

Background

Informal sector workers in low- and middle-income countries are disproportionately vulnerable to climate shocks due to precarious livelihoods, limited social protection, and structural inequities. In Pakistan, the Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) and one-time cash grants are the primary safety nets, yet their contribution to climate resilience remains underexplored. This study explored how BISP and emergency cash assistance shape the dimensions of climate resilience among informal sector workers in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, with particular attention to access barriers, gendered power relations, informal coping strategies, and climate sensitivity of programme design.

Methods

A qualitative phenomenological design was applied between April and June 2025 across three climatic zones of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: north, central and south. A multistage purposive sampling strategy was used to ensure diversity across geography, occupation, gender and urban–rural residence. Thirty in-depth interviews were conducted with informal workers aged 18 years and above who had been directly affected by a climate shock in the past five years. Six focus group discussions were also conducted with 36 institutional stakeholders from social protection, disaster management, health and local government sectors. Data were collected in Pashto and Urdu, transcribed, translated into English and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis within a descriptive phenomenological orientation.

Results

Thematic analysis identified five themes and ten sub-themes: (1) Inadequate and inflexible financial support (static assistance amid dynamic crises; debt, instability, and recovery fatigue); (2) Barriers to accessing social protection (digital gaps and bureaucratic complexity; cultural and logistical barriers); (3) Gendered constraints and local power structures (aid without autonomy; gatekeeping and informal exploitation); (4) Everyday adaptation and informal resilience (social networks and mutual aid; flexible routines and low-tech innovations); and (5) Towards responsive and climate-sensitive aid (disaster-specific, localised relief; early warning and infrastructure gaps).

Conclusions

Pakistan’s social protection systems provide critical but limited relief against climate shocks for informal workers. To build long-term resilience, reforms are required to make these systems climate-sensitive, adaptive, and gender-transformative. The findings offer policy lessons for other LMICs seeking to strengthen social protection as a pathway to climate resilience.