Scholarlink

Background <p>Secondary use of health data can accelerate discovery and enable personalized care, yet social acceptability relies on autonomy, transparency, and trust, especially in the context of security breaches and concerns about misuse. In Quebec, as in many Western settings, there is no formal mechanism to inform individuals about such use, underscoring the need for practical solutions. This quantitative cross-sectional study assessed whether transparency mechanisms increase trust in the use of health data for research; examined their perceived priority and acceptability; and explored effects across population subgroups.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey among 366 adults in Quebec (Canada) selected via stratified random sampling. The sample included a random selection of adult household members based on age. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and exploratory multivariate logistic regressions were performed.</p> Results <p>More than half of respondents were unaware that their health data may be used for research. Trust was higher for public-sector than private-sector researchers. Overall, 76% indicated that access to information would increase their trust, particularly younger adults (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.10–3.57). Over 90% judged implementing transparency mechanisms within five years as important, with stronger support among those aware of current data use (OR = 4.63, 95% CI: 1.33–16.20). A secure website was considered acceptable by 75% of respondents as a transparency mechanism. Individuals with high trust in public-sector researchers (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.08–3.94) and younger adults (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.13–3.71) were more likely to consider it important. Exploratory analyses suggested that awareness of current data use for research and pre-existing trust predict increased trust in researchers from various public and private organizations if a secure website is implemented.</p> Conclusion <p>Providing information through a transparency mechanism, particularly via a secure website, appears acceptable, valued, and potentially effective for increasing trust in the use of health data for research. Our findings support the feasibility of a web-based transparency portal and suggest tailoring communication to demographic, trust and awareness profiles.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Operationalizing transparency regarding the use of health data for research: a cross-sectional survey of citizens’ perspectives

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月8日

查看全文
  • Annabelle Cumyn,
  • Jean-Frédéric Ménard,
  • Emmanuel Bilodeau,
  • Roxanne Dault,
  • Jean-Philippe Morissette,
  • Marie-Pier Domingue,
  • Félix Camirand Lemyre,
  • Denis Boutin,
  • Jean-François Ethier

摘要

Background

Secondary use of health data can accelerate discovery and enable personalized care, yet social acceptability relies on autonomy, transparency, and trust, especially in the context of security breaches and concerns about misuse. In Quebec, as in many Western settings, there is no formal mechanism to inform individuals about such use, underscoring the need for practical solutions. This quantitative cross-sectional study assessed whether transparency mechanisms increase trust in the use of health data for research; examined their perceived priority and acceptability; and explored effects across population subgroups.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional telephone survey among 366 adults in Quebec (Canada) selected via stratified random sampling. The sample included a random selection of adult household members based on age. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and exploratory multivariate logistic regressions were performed.

Results

More than half of respondents were unaware that their health data may be used for research. Trust was higher for public-sector than private-sector researchers. Overall, 76% indicated that access to information would increase their trust, particularly younger adults (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.10–3.57). Over 90% judged implementing transparency mechanisms within five years as important, with stronger support among those aware of current data use (OR = 4.63, 95% CI: 1.33–16.20). A secure website was considered acceptable by 75% of respondents as a transparency mechanism. Individuals with high trust in public-sector researchers (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.08–3.94) and younger adults (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.13–3.71) were more likely to consider it important. Exploratory analyses suggested that awareness of current data use for research and pre-existing trust predict increased trust in researchers from various public and private organizations if a secure website is implemented.

Conclusion

Providing information through a transparency mechanism, particularly via a secure website, appears acceptable, valued, and potentially effective for increasing trust in the use of health data for research. Our findings support the feasibility of a web-based transparency portal and suggest tailoring communication to demographic, trust and awareness profiles.