Scholarlink

Background <p>Loneliness is a growing health and social challenge. The COVID-19 pandemic boosted feelings of loneliness for many people. To combat loneliness, a wide range of interventions have been developed and evaluated for their efficacy and effectiveness. As a result, many new interventions to alleviate loneliness have been developed, especially technological interventions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive and up—to-date systematic review to identify interventions aimed at loneliness and social isolation among adults, 60&#xa0;years and older published during or post-pandemic.</p> Methods <p>A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies between 2020 and 2024 across five online databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Title and abstract screening, critical appraisal of the studies, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. A narrative approach was adopted to assess and integrate the diverse findings from the research.</p> Results <p>Ultimately, 79 studies were included in this systematic review. The results are structured based on the categorization of the interventions, which includes differentiation between analogue interventions, technological interventions and multicomponent (analogue and technological) interventions. The effectiveness of analogue interventions, particularly community-based interventions such as group meetings, social participation programs, and educational or psychological interventions, tended to be superior to that of technological interventions.</p> Conclusions <p>The combination of analogue and technological interventions in particular produced promising results regarding a decrease of loneliness. Specific interventions must be tailored to the target group and setting and regularly reevaluated. The aim now should be to implement these interventions comprehensively and monitor their effectiveness over several years. Future research should focus on differentiating the circumstances under which various forms of intervention are effective.</p> Trial registration <p>PROSPERO systematic review registration: CRD42024538755.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Interventions against loneliness and social isolation in older adults– a systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月18日

查看全文
  • Johanna Bergsträsser,
  • Teresa Schmahl,
  • Jost Steinhäuser,
  • Katja Goetz

摘要

Background

Loneliness is a growing health and social challenge. The COVID-19 pandemic boosted feelings of loneliness for many people. To combat loneliness, a wide range of interventions have been developed and evaluated for their efficacy and effectiveness. As a result, many new interventions to alleviate loneliness have been developed, especially technological interventions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive and up—to-date systematic review to identify interventions aimed at loneliness and social isolation among adults, 60 years and older published during or post-pandemic.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted for studies between 2020 and 2024 across five online databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Title and abstract screening, critical appraisal of the studies, and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. A narrative approach was adopted to assess and integrate the diverse findings from the research.

Results

Ultimately, 79 studies were included in this systematic review. The results are structured based on the categorization of the interventions, which includes differentiation between analogue interventions, technological interventions and multicomponent (analogue and technological) interventions. The effectiveness of analogue interventions, particularly community-based interventions such as group meetings, social participation programs, and educational or psychological interventions, tended to be superior to that of technological interventions.

Conclusions

The combination of analogue and technological interventions in particular produced promising results regarding a decrease of loneliness. Specific interventions must be tailored to the target group and setting and regularly reevaluated. The aim now should be to implement these interventions comprehensively and monitor their effectiveness over several years. Future research should focus on differentiating the circumstances under which various forms of intervention are effective.

Trial registration

PROSPERO systematic review registration: CRD42024538755.