Scholarlink

Background <p>Effective public health communication during emergencies is critical for influencing behaviour and maintaining trust. Newspapers remain a key channel for disseminating institutional guidance, yet the extent to which their coverage aligns with international recommendations (e.g., World Health Organisation, WHO and Pan American Health Organisation, PAHO guidance) is not well established. Italy, the first European country to experience major COVID-19 outbreaks, provides a useful case for assessing the extent to which mainstream newspaper coverage aligned with WHO and PAHO recommendations for COVID-19 reporting.</p> Methods <p>A quali-quantitative, corpus-assisted discourse analysis was conducted on 5,621 articles (over 2.7&#xa0;million words) published in seven major Italian newspapers and included in the national press review of the Italian National Institute of Health. Lexical and discursive patterns were examined using SketchEngine, combining quantitative keyword, collocation, and concordance analyses with qualitative close reading. Findings were compared against reporting recommendations issued by the WHO and the PAHO.</p> Results <p>Italian newspapers largely reflected key elements of WHO/PAHO guidance, emphasizing preventive measures, vaccine-related content, and reliance on expert and institutional sources (e.g., scientists, researchers, and public health professionals). However, recurrent use of non-people-first labels for affected individuals and occasional instances of “false balance” in vaccine coverage were also identified.</p> Conclusions <p>Mixed corpus-based and qualitative approaches can support systematic assessment of newspaper reporting against WHO and PAHO recommendations for COVID-19 coverage. While many aspects of guideline-consistent reporting were observed, gaps remain in the use of non-stigmatising, people-first language and in evidence-weighted framing of scientific disagreement. Strengthening collaboration between journalists and public health institutions may support clear, ethical, and trustworthy communication in future emergencies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Unveiling the narrative: Italian media’s role in shaping public health messaging during COVID-19 - A corpus-assisted discourse analysis

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月17日

查看全文
  • Carlotta Fiammenghi,
  • Elisabetta Ceretti,
  • Loredana Covolo,
  • Nicola Pelizzari,
  • Laura Brunelli,
  • Anna Mirella Taranto,
  • Luana Penna,
  • Silvio Brusaferro,
  • Umberto Gelatti

摘要

Background

Effective public health communication during emergencies is critical for influencing behaviour and maintaining trust. Newspapers remain a key channel for disseminating institutional guidance, yet the extent to which their coverage aligns with international recommendations (e.g., World Health Organisation, WHO and Pan American Health Organisation, PAHO guidance) is not well established. Italy, the first European country to experience major COVID-19 outbreaks, provides a useful case for assessing the extent to which mainstream newspaper coverage aligned with WHO and PAHO recommendations for COVID-19 reporting.

Methods

A quali-quantitative, corpus-assisted discourse analysis was conducted on 5,621 articles (over 2.7 million words) published in seven major Italian newspapers and included in the national press review of the Italian National Institute of Health. Lexical and discursive patterns were examined using SketchEngine, combining quantitative keyword, collocation, and concordance analyses with qualitative close reading. Findings were compared against reporting recommendations issued by the WHO and the PAHO.

Results

Italian newspapers largely reflected key elements of WHO/PAHO guidance, emphasizing preventive measures, vaccine-related content, and reliance on expert and institutional sources (e.g., scientists, researchers, and public health professionals). However, recurrent use of non-people-first labels for affected individuals and occasional instances of “false balance” in vaccine coverage were also identified.

Conclusions

Mixed corpus-based and qualitative approaches can support systematic assessment of newspaper reporting against WHO and PAHO recommendations for COVID-19 coverage. While many aspects of guideline-consistent reporting were observed, gaps remain in the use of non-stigmatising, people-first language and in evidence-weighted framing of scientific disagreement. Strengthening collaboration between journalists and public health institutions may support clear, ethical, and trustworthy communication in future emergencies.