Background <p>Current evidence on short-term effects of air pollution on mortality often overlooks potential temporal variation and non-linear exposure-response relationships, bringing to biased effect estimates and limited accuracy of health risk assessments.</p> Methods <p>Leveraging high-quality daily environmental data from local air quality monitoring stations, we examined temporal changes and non-linear associations between daily concentrations of PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> and mortality from natural, cardiovascular, and respiratory causes in a high-risk area surrounding the city of Florence (Italy), from 2008 to 2019. Missing environmental data were handled through multiple imputation. For each air pollutant, we fitted Poisson regression models assuming: (1) a linear effect which was constant over time, (2) a linear effect allowed to flexibly vary over the study period, and (3) a non-linear effect which was constant over time. Regression splines were used to model non-linearities.</p> Results <p>During the entire period, we found that higher levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> were associated with increased mortality. These effects were time-varying, with a peak observed during 2012–2015, despite lower pollutant concentrations. Only PM<sub>2.5</sub> exhibited a non-linear relationship with natural and cardiovascular mortality, with greater effects at higher concentrations. The effects of NO<sub>2</sub> were minimal.</p> Conclusions <p>In the study area, the harmful effects of air pollution did not decline over time despite decreasing pollutant concentrations. This pattern may reflect changes in airborne particles composition, possibly linked to variations in traffic and major infrastructures development, or complex interactions with meteorological factors. Our findings highlight the need of high-quality local studies to disentangle complex exposure-response dynamics and support effective, context-specific regulatory decisions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The importance of investigating temporal variability in short-term effects of air pollution on mortality at the local level: a 12-year study in a high-risk Italian area

  • Chiara Marzi,
  • Daniela Nuvolone,
  • Michela Baccini

摘要

Background

Current evidence on short-term effects of air pollution on mortality often overlooks potential temporal variation and non-linear exposure-response relationships, bringing to biased effect estimates and limited accuracy of health risk assessments.

Methods

Leveraging high-quality daily environmental data from local air quality monitoring stations, we examined temporal changes and non-linear associations between daily concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and SO2 and mortality from natural, cardiovascular, and respiratory causes in a high-risk area surrounding the city of Florence (Italy), from 2008 to 2019. Missing environmental data were handled through multiple imputation. For each air pollutant, we fitted Poisson regression models assuming: (1) a linear effect which was constant over time, (2) a linear effect allowed to flexibly vary over the study period, and (3) a non-linear effect which was constant over time. Regression splines were used to model non-linearities.

Results

During the entire period, we found that higher levels of PM2.5, and SO2 were associated with increased mortality. These effects were time-varying, with a peak observed during 2012–2015, despite lower pollutant concentrations. Only PM2.5 exhibited a non-linear relationship with natural and cardiovascular mortality, with greater effects at higher concentrations. The effects of NO2 were minimal.

Conclusions

In the study area, the harmful effects of air pollution did not decline over time despite decreasing pollutant concentrations. This pattern may reflect changes in airborne particles composition, possibly linked to variations in traffic and major infrastructures development, or complex interactions with meteorological factors. Our findings highlight the need of high-quality local studies to disentangle complex exposure-response dynamics and support effective, context-specific regulatory decisions.