Background <p>On January 31<sup>st</sup> 2023, the Canadian province of British Columbia temporarily decriminalized the personal possession of certain illegal drugs up to 2.5&#xa0;g, cumulatively, for adults. A stated aim of this policy directive was to reduce the stigmatization of people who use drugs and increase access to health and harm reduction services. The aim of this study was to capture the prevalence and nature of potential barriers to such services under drug decriminalization.</p> Methods <p>We employed a mixed-methods study design, triangulating survey data from harm reduction service users in 2022 (<i>n</i> = 503) and 2023 (<i>n</i> = 433) alongside qualitative interviews with people who use drugs in British Columbia (<i>n</i> = 78) collected in 2023. Qualitative and quantitative findings were analysed convergently.</p> Results <p>Findings across both datasets suggest that reported barriers to health and harm reduction services persisted during British Columbia’s decriminalization pilot. Quantitative and qualitative data reflecting these barriers are presented in parallel under four themes: (1) stigma and fear of substance use disclosure, (2) stigma and access to services, (3) service-specific barriers, and (4) police-related barriers.</p> Conclusion <p>Decriminalization alone may be insufficient to address and/or mitigate the barriers that continue to constrain people who use drugs’ access to care. If the policy goal is to reduce barriers to health and harm reduction services, additional structural and institutional supports may be required.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Access to health and harm reduction services during drug decriminalization in British Columbia, Canada: a mixed-method study

  • Benjamin D. Scher,
  • Becca Wood,
  • Naomi Zakimi,
  • Mieke Fraser,
  • Alexis Crabtree,
  • Kaitlin Fajber,
  • Brooke Kinniburgh,
  • O. Kara Loewen,
  • Alissa Greer

摘要

Background

On January 31st 2023, the Canadian province of British Columbia temporarily decriminalized the personal possession of certain illegal drugs up to 2.5 g, cumulatively, for adults. A stated aim of this policy directive was to reduce the stigmatization of people who use drugs and increase access to health and harm reduction services. The aim of this study was to capture the prevalence and nature of potential barriers to such services under drug decriminalization.

Methods

We employed a mixed-methods study design, triangulating survey data from harm reduction service users in 2022 (n = 503) and 2023 (n = 433) alongside qualitative interviews with people who use drugs in British Columbia (n = 78) collected in 2023. Qualitative and quantitative findings were analysed convergently.

Results

Findings across both datasets suggest that reported barriers to health and harm reduction services persisted during British Columbia’s decriminalization pilot. Quantitative and qualitative data reflecting these barriers are presented in parallel under four themes: (1) stigma and fear of substance use disclosure, (2) stigma and access to services, (3) service-specific barriers, and (4) police-related barriers.

Conclusion

Decriminalization alone may be insufficient to address and/or mitigate the barriers that continue to constrain people who use drugs’ access to care. If the policy goal is to reduce barriers to health and harm reduction services, additional structural and institutional supports may be required.