Scholarlink

Background <p>Extreme heat is among the deadliest climate hazards in the United States, yet municipal emergency planning often overlooks people experiencing homelessness (PEH). This study examines how heat exposure and survival are shaped by inequality, governance, and spatial exclusion in Orlando, Florida.</p> Methods <p>We conducted thirty‑eight semi‑structured interviews with PEH during the summers of 2024–2025 at an urban day‑services hub. Using an urban political ecology lens and thematic analysis with independent coding and triangulation, we explored health impacts, coping strategies, barriers to formal cooling, and recommendations for policy change.</p> Results <p>Participants reported fragile, improvised strategies (e.g., shifting shade, wetting clothing, riding buses, peer mutual aid) amid inconsistent access to cooling centers and water. Barriers included identification rules, transport, policing and displacement, and information gaps. Reported consequences included dehydration, sleep disruption, exacerbation of chronic illness, anxiety, and depression. Informal ‘break‑offs’ and mutual aid were lifelines but unpredictable. Participants consistently framed housing, accessible cooling infrastructure, predictable services, and human‑centered governance as urgent needs.</p> Conclusions <p>Extreme heat functions as a socially produced crisis that magnifies existing inequities for unhoused residents. Addressing risk requires shifting from ad hoc emergency responses toward durable investments in housing, inclusive cooling infrastructure, and participatory, dignity‑centered governance.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Shade and survival: heat, homelessness, and human dignity

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月7日

查看全文
  • Carla Reddle Cox,
  • Nicole Haberland,
  • Riley Nguyen

摘要

Background

Extreme heat is among the deadliest climate hazards in the United States, yet municipal emergency planning often overlooks people experiencing homelessness (PEH). This study examines how heat exposure and survival are shaped by inequality, governance, and spatial exclusion in Orlando, Florida.

Methods

We conducted thirty‑eight semi‑structured interviews with PEH during the summers of 2024–2025 at an urban day‑services hub. Using an urban political ecology lens and thematic analysis with independent coding and triangulation, we explored health impacts, coping strategies, barriers to formal cooling, and recommendations for policy change.

Results

Participants reported fragile, improvised strategies (e.g., shifting shade, wetting clothing, riding buses, peer mutual aid) amid inconsistent access to cooling centers and water. Barriers included identification rules, transport, policing and displacement, and information gaps. Reported consequences included dehydration, sleep disruption, exacerbation of chronic illness, anxiety, and depression. Informal ‘break‑offs’ and mutual aid were lifelines but unpredictable. Participants consistently framed housing, accessible cooling infrastructure, predictable services, and human‑centered governance as urgent needs.

Conclusions

Extreme heat functions as a socially produced crisis that magnifies existing inequities for unhoused residents. Addressing risk requires shifting from ad hoc emergency responses toward durable investments in housing, inclusive cooling infrastructure, and participatory, dignity‑centered governance.