Scholarlink

Background <p>Loss in life expectancy (LLE) by socioeconomic position (SEP) is obtained to explore cancer disparities. Often education or income are used to determine SEP. However, the low income of some older individuals or females within households with greater overall resources may not accurately reflect their SEP, potentially leading to biased estimates. Our study investigates how various conceptualizations of SEP influence the extent of these disparities.</p> Methods <p>Data included all colon cancer diagnoses in Sweden between 2008 and 2016. We estimated LLE using different SEP indicators: education, individual income, part of household income. Household income accounts for individuals with low individual income but within high-income households. We allocated patients to income groups creating quartiles, overall or separately by sex, age-groups, or both, to account for SEP misclassification. We analysed data using flexible parametric survival models.</p> Results <p>Standardised LLE varied from 5.05 to 5.62 years for the lowest to the highest education, resulting in a 0.57-year difference. When income was used to determine SEP, LLE was similar with disparities ranging from 0.29 to 0.77 across definitions. Age and sex specific LLE disparities varied more across definitions. Disparities between 60-year-old females in the highest-lowest income groups were 0.94 when using household income and − 0.17 when using individual income.</p> Conclusions <p>When studying LLE by SEP, thoughtful consideration must be given to selecting the most suitable indicator for conceptualizing SEP. The choice should align with the specific SEP pathway of interest and address potential misclassification concerns relevant to the study population.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Loss in life expectancy after a colon cancer diagnosis by socioeconomic group: does the indicator of socioeconomic position matter?

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月28日

查看全文
  • Elisavet Syriopoulou,
  • Alexander Miething,
  • Erik Osterman,
  • Caroline Nordenvall,
  • Therese M-L Andersson

摘要

Background

Loss in life expectancy (LLE) by socioeconomic position (SEP) is obtained to explore cancer disparities. Often education or income are used to determine SEP. However, the low income of some older individuals or females within households with greater overall resources may not accurately reflect their SEP, potentially leading to biased estimates. Our study investigates how various conceptualizations of SEP influence the extent of these disparities.

Methods

Data included all colon cancer diagnoses in Sweden between 2008 and 2016. We estimated LLE using different SEP indicators: education, individual income, part of household income. Household income accounts for individuals with low individual income but within high-income households. We allocated patients to income groups creating quartiles, overall or separately by sex, age-groups, or both, to account for SEP misclassification. We analysed data using flexible parametric survival models.

Results

Standardised LLE varied from 5.05 to 5.62 years for the lowest to the highest education, resulting in a 0.57-year difference. When income was used to determine SEP, LLE was similar with disparities ranging from 0.29 to 0.77 across definitions. Age and sex specific LLE disparities varied more across definitions. Disparities between 60-year-old females in the highest-lowest income groups were 0.94 when using household income and − 0.17 when using individual income.

Conclusions

When studying LLE by SEP, thoughtful consideration must be given to selecting the most suitable indicator for conceptualizing SEP. The choice should align with the specific SEP pathway of interest and address potential misclassification concerns relevant to the study population.