Scholarlink

Background <p>Particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence suggests socioeconomic and ethnic minority groups are disproportionately exposed to higher outdoor air pollution, exacerbating existing health inequalities. However, most research focuses on outdoor air pollution, despite people spending most of their time indoors. We compare how indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations vary between households of different socioeconomic status and ethnicity, and test for associations with asthma-related symptoms.</p> Methods <p>We recruited 321 households from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort. Low-cost commercial sensors sampled PM<sub>2.5</sub> in three rooms over a two-week period. Information on socio-economic status, home and building characteristics, and asthma related symptoms were collected for 309 mothers and 293 children. We calculated metrics for indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration (µg/m<sup>3</sup>) to compare with current guideline thresholds and to capture peak events that might be important for health symptoms. We investigated whether PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations varied by key sociodemographic and home characteristics. Logistic regressions examined whether PM<sub>2.5</sub> metrics predicted asthma-related symptom occurrence for mothers and children, controlling for covariates.</p> Results <p>Homes had a mean daily average indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration of 20.2&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3</sup>, exceeded the WHO 24-hour threshold an average of 41% monitored days, and exceeded 100&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3</sup> an average of 4% monitored hours. South Asian homes had higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration than White British or Other ethnicity homes (23.5&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3</sup>, 17.1&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3</sup>, and 16.5&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3</sup> respectively). Higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> was observed with higher deprivation levels (most deprived, 24.0&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3</sup>, least deprived, 12.7&#xa0;µg/m<sup>3)</sup>. Higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels were seen in rented versus owned homes, smoking versus non-smoking households, terraced and semi-detached versus detached homes, and gas versus electric cooking appliances. We did not find clear associations between asthma-related symptoms and PM<sub>2.5</sub> metrics.</p> Conclusions <p>The high indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels recorded in homes indicate an urgent need to tackle indoor air pollution as a health risk factor, particularly in deprived and minority ethnic households. Policy action should focus on launching national public awareness campaigns, supporting transition to cleaner cooking and air cleaning technologies, and addressing socioeconomic disparities related to high indoor air pollution.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Inequalities and indoor air pollution: a prospective observational study of particulate matter (PM2.5) levels in 309 UK homes from the Born in Bradford cohort study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月10日

查看全文
  • Rachael W. Cheung,
  • Lia Chatzidiakou,
  • Tiffany C. Yang,
  • Simon P. O’Meara,
  • David R. Shaw,
  • Denisa Genes,
  • Yunqi Shao,
  • Athina Ruangkanit,
  • Thomas Warburton,
  • Ashish Kumar,
  • Sri Hapsari Budisulistiorini,
  • Chantelle Wood,
  • Gordon McFiggans,
  • Nicola Carslaw,
  • Jacqueline F. Hamilton,
  • Rosemary R. C. McEachan

摘要

Background

Particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence suggests socioeconomic and ethnic minority groups are disproportionately exposed to higher outdoor air pollution, exacerbating existing health inequalities. However, most research focuses on outdoor air pollution, despite people spending most of their time indoors. We compare how indoor PM2.5 concentrations vary between households of different socioeconomic status and ethnicity, and test for associations with asthma-related symptoms.

Methods

We recruited 321 households from the multi-ethnic Born in Bradford cohort. Low-cost commercial sensors sampled PM2.5 in three rooms over a two-week period. Information on socio-economic status, home and building characteristics, and asthma related symptoms were collected for 309 mothers and 293 children. We calculated metrics for indoor PM2.5 concentration (µg/m3) to compare with current guideline thresholds and to capture peak events that might be important for health symptoms. We investigated whether PM2.5 concentrations varied by key sociodemographic and home characteristics. Logistic regressions examined whether PM2.5 metrics predicted asthma-related symptom occurrence for mothers and children, controlling for covariates.

Results

Homes had a mean daily average indoor PM2.5 concentration of 20.2 µg/m3, exceeded the WHO 24-hour threshold an average of 41% monitored days, and exceeded 100 µg/m3 an average of 4% monitored hours. South Asian homes had higher PM2.5 concentration than White British or Other ethnicity homes (23.5 µg/m3, 17.1 µg/m3, and 16.5 µg/m3 respectively). Higher PM2.5 was observed with higher deprivation levels (most deprived, 24.0 µg/m3, least deprived, 12.7 µg/m3). Higher PM2.5 levels were seen in rented versus owned homes, smoking versus non-smoking households, terraced and semi-detached versus detached homes, and gas versus electric cooking appliances. We did not find clear associations between asthma-related symptoms and PM2.5 metrics.

Conclusions

The high indoor PM2.5 levels recorded in homes indicate an urgent need to tackle indoor air pollution as a health risk factor, particularly in deprived and minority ethnic households. Policy action should focus on launching national public awareness campaigns, supporting transition to cleaner cooking and air cleaning technologies, and addressing socioeconomic disparities related to high indoor air pollution.