Scholarlink

Background <p>Adolescent suicidality currently ranks as the third leading cause of death among adolescents, affecting global adolescent population, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nepal. This study explores the assessment of suicidality as an adverse event in adolescent mental health research in Nepal and outlines practical strategies for integrating suicide management protocols into mental health surveys in LMICs. It offers guidance on suicide risk assessment and referral pathways for vulnerable adolescents and contribute to suicide prevention efforts.</p> Methods <p>This study, a part of a cross-sectional survey with 490 adolescents aged 13–15 in public secondary schools in Kathmandu valley, used a three step approach of the Suicide Management Protocol (SMP) to identify and manage participants at risk of suicidality. Using the specific item under the measurement of mental health among adolescents and young people at the population level (MMAPP) tool followed by administering the suicide screening tool, those at risk of suicidality were identified by the researchers. Clinical assessments were then conducted by the psychosocial counsellor to categorize risk levels using Beck Suicide Intent Scale (BSIS) and provided appropriate management according to the severity.</p> Results <p>Of total 490 participants, while the single item under the MMAPP assessment identified 33 (6.7%) participants at risk, further screening using the suicide screening tool confirmed 25(5.1%) as positives, by the researchers. The psychosocial counsellor clinically assessed the 25 participants screened as suicide risk positive and found that 10 (40%) as high risk, 8 (32%) as moderate, and 7 (28%) as low risk. The clinical management of the cases at a differing level of risk was then managed as per the designated clinical pathways by developing protective behavior and reducing suicide related risk factors. All the participants were found to be safe and functioning normally through the course of clinical management, ranging from 2 to 6 sessions.</p> Conclusions <p>Overall, integrating suicidality measures in mental health surveys was found to be effective suicide assessment and preventive strategy for adolescents in Nepal. Developing suicide management protocols within mental health surveys is essential and feasible for real-time monitoring and response to suicidal behavior among at-risk populations in LMICs, including Nepal.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Assessment and management of suicidality in a mental health survey among poverty affected adolescents in Nepal

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月27日

查看全文
  • Rakesh Singh,
  • Karuna Chhetri,
  • Parinati Khanal,
  • Sabina Maharjan,
  • Emily Garman,
  • Mark J. D. Jordans,
  • Crick Lund,
  • Nagendra Luitel,
  • Kamal Gautam

摘要

Background

Adolescent suicidality currently ranks as the third leading cause of death among adolescents, affecting global adolescent population, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nepal. This study explores the assessment of suicidality as an adverse event in adolescent mental health research in Nepal and outlines practical strategies for integrating suicide management protocols into mental health surveys in LMICs. It offers guidance on suicide risk assessment and referral pathways for vulnerable adolescents and contribute to suicide prevention efforts.

Methods

This study, a part of a cross-sectional survey with 490 adolescents aged 13–15 in public secondary schools in Kathmandu valley, used a three step approach of the Suicide Management Protocol (SMP) to identify and manage participants at risk of suicidality. Using the specific item under the measurement of mental health among adolescents and young people at the population level (MMAPP) tool followed by administering the suicide screening tool, those at risk of suicidality were identified by the researchers. Clinical assessments were then conducted by the psychosocial counsellor to categorize risk levels using Beck Suicide Intent Scale (BSIS) and provided appropriate management according to the severity.

Results

Of total 490 participants, while the single item under the MMAPP assessment identified 33 (6.7%) participants at risk, further screening using the suicide screening tool confirmed 25(5.1%) as positives, by the researchers. The psychosocial counsellor clinically assessed the 25 participants screened as suicide risk positive and found that 10 (40%) as high risk, 8 (32%) as moderate, and 7 (28%) as low risk. The clinical management of the cases at a differing level of risk was then managed as per the designated clinical pathways by developing protective behavior and reducing suicide related risk factors. All the participants were found to be safe and functioning normally through the course of clinical management, ranging from 2 to 6 sessions.

Conclusions

Overall, integrating suicidality measures in mental health surveys was found to be effective suicide assessment and preventive strategy for adolescents in Nepal. Developing suicide management protocols within mental health surveys is essential and feasible for real-time monitoring and response to suicidal behavior among at-risk populations in LMICs, including Nepal.