Scholarlink

Background <p>The effect of pre-pregnancy intrauterine device (IUD) use on subsequent preterm birth (PTB) remains unclear. We aim to investigate the association between IUD use before pregnancy and subsequent PTB.</p> Methods <p>A total of 240,437 women who participated in the National Free Preconception Health Examination Project (NFPHEP) in Yunnan from 2013 to 2019 were included in the study. All study participants were classified into three groups according to their use of pre-pregnancy contraceptive methods: non-method users, IUD users, and other method users. We used a multivariable Poisson regression model to investigate the association between the use of an IUD before pregnancy and subsequent PTB. Further models analyzed the multiplicative and additive interactions between pre-pregnancy IUD use and county deprivation.</p> Results <p>Of all the participants, 45,374 (18.9%) used IUDs before pregnancy, 39,414 (16.4%) used other contraceptive methods, and 155,649 (64.7%) were non-method users. The overall PTB rate was 5.30% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.20–5.38%), and women in the IUD group had a significantly lower PTB rate (4.86%, 95% CI 4.66–5.06%) than women in the non-method (5.42%, 95% CI 5.31–5.53%) and other method groups (5.33%, 95% CI 5.11–5.56%). IUD use before pregnancy was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent PTB (model 1: adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.89; model 2: aRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.90). In counties with a normal level of development, IUD users had a 30% lower risk of subsequent PTB than non-users (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.78). Compared with non-IUD users (incuding non-method and other method users) from the least developed counties, those from counties with a normal level of socioeconomic development had the lowest risk of subsequent PTB (aRR 0.71, 0.62 to 0.82). The additive interaction between pre-pregnancy IUD use and low level of county development was statistically significant (relative excess risk due to interaction [RERI] -0.27, -0.41 to -0.14).</p> Conclusion <p>Pre-pregnancy IUD use is associated with a reduced risk of subsequent PTB. Pre-pregnancy IUD users in counties with a normal level of development were associated with a lower risk of subsequent PTB than their counterparts in the least developed countries.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Pre-pregnancy intrauterine device use is associated with a reduced risk of subsequent preterm birth: a large population-based cohort study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月18日

查看全文
  • Xing Chen,
  • Tao Wang,
  • Yan Zhang,
  • Zhengyuan Xie,
  • Cai Kong,
  • Bingxue Wu,
  • Yuzhi Lan,
  • Hanfeng Ye,
  • Xiangjing Song,
  • Zigao Zhao,
  • Yan Che

摘要

Background

The effect of pre-pregnancy intrauterine device (IUD) use on subsequent preterm birth (PTB) remains unclear. We aim to investigate the association between IUD use before pregnancy and subsequent PTB.

Methods

A total of 240,437 women who participated in the National Free Preconception Health Examination Project (NFPHEP) in Yunnan from 2013 to 2019 were included in the study. All study participants were classified into three groups according to their use of pre-pregnancy contraceptive methods: non-method users, IUD users, and other method users. We used a multivariable Poisson regression model to investigate the association between the use of an IUD before pregnancy and subsequent PTB. Further models analyzed the multiplicative and additive interactions between pre-pregnancy IUD use and county deprivation.

Results

Of all the participants, 45,374 (18.9%) used IUDs before pregnancy, 39,414 (16.4%) used other contraceptive methods, and 155,649 (64.7%) were non-method users. The overall PTB rate was 5.30% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.20–5.38%), and women in the IUD group had a significantly lower PTB rate (4.86%, 95% CI 4.66–5.06%) than women in the non-method (5.42%, 95% CI 5.31–5.53%) and other method groups (5.33%, 95% CI 5.11–5.56%). IUD use before pregnancy was associated with a reduced risk of subsequent PTB (model 1: adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.84, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.89; model 2: aRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.90). In counties with a normal level of development, IUD users had a 30% lower risk of subsequent PTB than non-users (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.78). Compared with non-IUD users (incuding non-method and other method users) from the least developed counties, those from counties with a normal level of socioeconomic development had the lowest risk of subsequent PTB (aRR 0.71, 0.62 to 0.82). The additive interaction between pre-pregnancy IUD use and low level of county development was statistically significant (relative excess risk due to interaction [RERI] -0.27, -0.41 to -0.14).

Conclusion

Pre-pregnancy IUD use is associated with a reduced risk of subsequent PTB. Pre-pregnancy IUD users in counties with a normal level of development were associated with a lower risk of subsequent PTB than their counterparts in the least developed countries.