Background <p>Social attention abnormalities are a hallmark of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), often characterized by atypical gaze patterns.</p> Aim <p>This report showed the real-world feasibility of an eye-tracking–based screening paradigm for ASD across diverse general population samples.</p> Methods <p>A total of 536 adults participated in public demonstrations. An Autism Index (AI), derived from a previously validated eye-tracking paradigm, was calculated from gaze patterns toward social and nonsocial stimuli. Participants were stratified into typically developing (TD), neurodivergent, and ASD groups based on validated AI cut-offs.</p> Results <p>Median AI scores differed significantly across groups − 0.31 (TD), 0.53 (neurodivergent), and 0.69 (ASD)- with post-hoc tests confirming higher scores in the ASD and neurodivergent groups versus TD. Gender-based analyses showed that males had significantly higher AI scores than females (<i>p</i> = 0.028). Among those classified as ASD, 95% reported a formal diagnosis, supporting the validity of the tool. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.997. At the optimal cut-off score of 0.555, the tool achieved 100% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity.</p> Conclusion <p>This report highlights the feasibility and accuracy of the eye-tracking paradigm as a scalable and objective screening tool for ASD in general adult populations, supporting its potential for broader clinical implementation.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Real-world application of an eye-tracking device for autism screening and diagnosis: a short report from public demonstrations in Qatar, Dubai and the U.S

  • Fouad Al Shaban,
  • Thomas W. Frazier,
  • Iman Ghazal,
  • Fatema Al-Faraj,
  • Sarah Aqel,
  • I. Richard Thompson

摘要

Background

Social attention abnormalities are a hallmark of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), often characterized by atypical gaze patterns.

Aim

This report showed the real-world feasibility of an eye-tracking–based screening paradigm for ASD across diverse general population samples.

Methods

A total of 536 adults participated in public demonstrations. An Autism Index (AI), derived from a previously validated eye-tracking paradigm, was calculated from gaze patterns toward social and nonsocial stimuli. Participants were stratified into typically developing (TD), neurodivergent, and ASD groups based on validated AI cut-offs.

Results

Median AI scores differed significantly across groups − 0.31 (TD), 0.53 (neurodivergent), and 0.69 (ASD)- with post-hoc tests confirming higher scores in the ASD and neurodivergent groups versus TD. Gender-based analyses showed that males had significantly higher AI scores than females (p = 0.028). Among those classified as ASD, 95% reported a formal diagnosis, supporting the validity of the tool. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.997. At the optimal cut-off score of 0.555, the tool achieved 100% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity.

Conclusion

This report highlights the feasibility and accuracy of the eye-tracking paradigm as a scalable and objective screening tool for ASD in general adult populations, supporting its potential for broader clinical implementation.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.