Scholarlink

Objective <p>To investigate the relationship between individual volitional control and mobile phone addiction and the potentially mediating roles of non-adaptive cognitive-emotional regulation strategies and the need for uniqueness in the relationship.</p> Methods <p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 1,932) completed an online questionnaire including demographic questions, the Volitional Control Scale, the Mobile Phone Addiction Scale, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and the Uniqueness Requirement Scale.</p> Results <p>Correlation analyses showed that there were significant negative correlations between mobile phone addiction, non-adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, the need for uniqueness and volitional control, and positive correlations between non-adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, the need for uniqueness, and mobile phone addiction. Non-adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies and the need for uniqueness mediated the relationship between volitional control and mobile phone addiction.</p> Conclusion <p>Individuals’ volitional control can both directly and negatively predict mobile phone addiction, and indirectly influence mobile phone addiction through the multiple mediating effects of non-adaptive cognitive-emotional regulation strategies and the need for uniqueness.</p> Clinical trial number <p>N/A.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Volitional control and cell phone addiction: development of a pathway mode

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月8日

查看全文
  • Beile Cong,
  • Sheng Qu,
  • Rui Qiu,
  • Ziqing Ye,
  • Zhongying Wu,
  • Yuting Feng,
  • Mengze Li,
  • Bin Liu,
  • Qun Yang

摘要

Objective

To investigate the relationship between individual volitional control and mobile phone addiction and the potentially mediating roles of non-adaptive cognitive-emotional regulation strategies and the need for uniqueness in the relationship.

Methods

Participants (N = 1,932) completed an online questionnaire including demographic questions, the Volitional Control Scale, the Mobile Phone Addiction Scale, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and the Uniqueness Requirement Scale.

Results

Correlation analyses showed that there were significant negative correlations between mobile phone addiction, non-adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, the need for uniqueness and volitional control, and positive correlations between non-adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, the need for uniqueness, and mobile phone addiction. Non-adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies and the need for uniqueness mediated the relationship between volitional control and mobile phone addiction.

Conclusion

Individuals’ volitional control can both directly and negatively predict mobile phone addiction, and indirectly influence mobile phone addiction through the multiple mediating effects of non-adaptive cognitive-emotional regulation strategies and the need for uniqueness.

Clinical trial number

N/A.