Background <p>The Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence-based web application, has demonstrated substantial potential across various knowledge domains, particularly in medicine. This cross-sectional study assessed the validity and possible usefulness of the ChatGPT-4 in assessing anxiety and depression by comparing two questionnaires.</p> Methods <p>This study tasked ChatGPT-4 with generating a structured interview questionnaire based on the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7). These new measures were referred to as GPT-PHQ-9 and GPT-GAD-7. This study utilized Spearman correlation analysis, Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Youden’s index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Bland–Altman plots to evaluate the consistency between scores from a ChatGPT-4 adapted questionnaire and those from a validated questionnaire.</p> Results <p>A total of 200 college students participated. Cronbach’s α indicated acceptable reliability for both GPT-PHQ-9 (α = 0.75) and GPT-GAD-7 (α = 0.76). ICC values were 0.80 for PHQ-9 and 0.70 for GAD-7. Spearman’s correlation showed moderate associations with PHQ-9 (<i>p</i> = 0.63) and GAD-7 (<i>p</i> = 0.68). ROC curve analysis revealed optimal cutoffs of 9.5 for depressive symptoms and 6.5 for anxiety symptoms, both with high sensitivity and specificity.</p> Conclusions <p>The questionnaire adapted by ChatGPT-4 demonstrated good consistency with the validated questionnaire. Future studies should investigate the usefulness of the ChatGPT designed questionnaire in different populations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluating the agreement between ChatGPT-4 and validated questionnaires in screening for anxiety and depression in college students: a cross-sectional study

  • Jiali Liu,
  • Juan Gu,
  • Mengjie Tong,
  • Yake Yue,
  • Yufei Qiu,
  • Lijuan Zeng,
  • Yiqing Yu,
  • Fen Yang,
  • Shuyan Zhao

摘要

Background

The Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), an artificial intelligence-based web application, has demonstrated substantial potential across various knowledge domains, particularly in medicine. This cross-sectional study assessed the validity and possible usefulness of the ChatGPT-4 in assessing anxiety and depression by comparing two questionnaires.

Methods

This study tasked ChatGPT-4 with generating a structured interview questionnaire based on the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7). These new measures were referred to as GPT-PHQ-9 and GPT-GAD-7. This study utilized Spearman correlation analysis, Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Youden’s index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Bland–Altman plots to evaluate the consistency between scores from a ChatGPT-4 adapted questionnaire and those from a validated questionnaire.

Results

A total of 200 college students participated. Cronbach’s α indicated acceptable reliability for both GPT-PHQ-9 (α = 0.75) and GPT-GAD-7 (α = 0.76). ICC values were 0.80 for PHQ-9 and 0.70 for GAD-7. Spearman’s correlation showed moderate associations with PHQ-9 (p = 0.63) and GAD-7 (p = 0.68). ROC curve analysis revealed optimal cutoffs of 9.5 for depressive symptoms and 6.5 for anxiety symptoms, both with high sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

The questionnaire adapted by ChatGPT-4 demonstrated good consistency with the validated questionnaire. Future studies should investigate the usefulness of the ChatGPT designed questionnaire in different populations.