Scholarlink

Background <p>Hirschsprung’s disease (HSCR) is a congenital gastrointestinal disorder. Pull-through (PT) surgery, the primary treatment, often leads to recurrent constipation. The causes of redo pull-through (redo-PT) for recurrent constipation remain unclear, with limited research on follow-up outcomes and prognostic factors.</p> Methods <p>We searched “PubMed” and “Web of Science” for references using the title/abstract terms “Hirschsprung” and “Redo pull-through”. We enrolled patients from the literature review group and our retrospective group who underwent redo-PT for recurrent constipation. A comparative analysis was conducted between two groups based on the clinical information for redo-PT.</p> Results <p>A total of 360 cases were collected from the references (327 patients) and our center (33 patients). Recurrent aganglionosis (RA) and Mechanical Obstruction (MO) were the primary reasons for redo-PT, accounting for 52.50% and 36.67%, respectively. When comparing the causes of redo-PT between the literature group and our center group, RA accounted for 49.85% and 75.76%, while MO accounted for 49.85% and 21.21%, respectively. Prognostic outcomes of 31 patients from our center were analyzed, revealing no significant associations between postoperative complications and gender, age, causes of redo pull-through, or surgical approach (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05).</p> Conclusions <p>Recurrent constipation requiring redo-PT are predominantly caused by RA and MO. Gender, age, causes of redo pull-through, or surgical approach do not affect the prognosis of redo-PT. The laparoscopic approach demonstrated superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the laparotomy approach.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Analysis of the causes of redo pull-through for recurrent constipation and the risk factors affecting the prognosis of the Hirschsprung’s disease: a single-center retrospective study and systematic review

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月22日

查看全文
  • Jun Xiao,
  • Shimin Yang,
  • Lei Xiang,
  • Bo Qin,
  • Jingyi You,
  • Mei Dong,
  • Youshan Xie,
  • Xuan Zhang,
  • Xuyong Chen,
  • Zejian Li,
  • Honglin Li,
  • Jiexiong Feng

摘要

Background

Hirschsprung’s disease (HSCR) is a congenital gastrointestinal disorder. Pull-through (PT) surgery, the primary treatment, often leads to recurrent constipation. The causes of redo pull-through (redo-PT) for recurrent constipation remain unclear, with limited research on follow-up outcomes and prognostic factors.

Methods

We searched “PubMed” and “Web of Science” for references using the title/abstract terms “Hirschsprung” and “Redo pull-through”. We enrolled patients from the literature review group and our retrospective group who underwent redo-PT for recurrent constipation. A comparative analysis was conducted between two groups based on the clinical information for redo-PT.

Results

A total of 360 cases were collected from the references (327 patients) and our center (33 patients). Recurrent aganglionosis (RA) and Mechanical Obstruction (MO) were the primary reasons for redo-PT, accounting for 52.50% and 36.67%, respectively. When comparing the causes of redo-PT between the literature group and our center group, RA accounted for 49.85% and 75.76%, while MO accounted for 49.85% and 21.21%, respectively. Prognostic outcomes of 31 patients from our center were analyzed, revealing no significant associations between postoperative complications and gender, age, causes of redo pull-through, or surgical approach (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Recurrent constipation requiring redo-PT are predominantly caused by RA and MO. Gender, age, causes of redo pull-through, or surgical approach do not affect the prognosis of redo-PT. The laparoscopic approach demonstrated superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the laparotomy approach.