Scholarlink

Background <p>To evaluate differences in Corvis ST tonometry (CST) parameters between healthy eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively analyzed CST parameters of 24 healthy eyes and 24 eyes with PACG after 1:1 propensity score matching based on age, sex, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness. Differences in 12 CST parameters were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models, with group as a fixed effect and subject ID as a random intercept to account for inter-eye correlation. The models were adjusted for age, sex, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness. Multiple comparisons across parameters were controlled using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate procedure.</p> Results <p>Compared with healthy eyes, eyes with PACG exhibited greater A1 deformation amplitude and a shorter A2 time.</p> Conclusions <p>Compared with healthy eyes, eyes with PACG showed differences in selected CST parameters, specifically greater A1 deformation amplitude and shorter A2 time. These findings may indicate altered corneal dynamic response behavior in PACG.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Corvis ST parameters in eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma: a retrospective cross-sectional study using propensity score matching

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月14日

查看全文
  • Yuta Nakaniida,
  • Kana Tokumo,
  • Shunsuke Nakakura,
  • Ryo Asaoka,
  • Yoshiaki Kiuchi,
  • Hirokazu Sakaguchi

摘要

Background

To evaluate differences in Corvis ST tonometry (CST) parameters between healthy eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed CST parameters of 24 healthy eyes and 24 eyes with PACG after 1:1 propensity score matching based on age, sex, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness. Differences in 12 CST parameters were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models, with group as a fixed effect and subject ID as a random intercept to account for inter-eye correlation. The models were adjusted for age, sex, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness. Multiple comparisons across parameters were controlled using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate procedure.

Results

Compared with healthy eyes, eyes with PACG exhibited greater A1 deformation amplitude and a shorter A2 time.

Conclusions

Compared with healthy eyes, eyes with PACG showed differences in selected CST parameters, specifically greater A1 deformation amplitude and shorter A2 time. These findings may indicate altered corneal dynamic response behavior in PACG.