Scholarlink

Background <p>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition that affects various organs, including the eyes. Corneal endothelial dysfunction, a key factor in ocular health, can be influenced by long-term diabetes. Early detection of corneal changes, such as central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (CD), coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonality (HEX), may provide insights into diabetic ocular complications. This study evaluates the differences in corneal endothelial parameters between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.</p> Aim <p>To compare the corneal endothelial parameters, including CCT, CD, CV, and HEX, in diabetic patients and non-diabetic controls, and assess the correlation between these parameters and the duration of diabetes.</p> Methodology <p>This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at a tertiary eye care hospital with 100 eyes from 50 diabetic patients and 100 eyes from 50 age-matched non-diabetic controls. All participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological evaluation, including intraocular pressure measurement, refraction, best corrected visual acuity, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Corneal endothelial imaging was performed using non-contact specular microscopy to assess CCT, CD, CV, and HEX. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with a p-value of &lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p> Results <p>In our study, diabetic patients had significantly higher central corneal thickness (CCT) in both eyes (OD: 593.9 ± 60.2&#xa0;μm; OS: 610.5 ± 60.7&#xa0;μm) compared to non-diabetics (OD: 550.9 ± 66.1&#xa0;μm; OS: 593.9 ± 60.2&#xa0;μm). Hexagonality (HEX) was lower in diabetics (OD: 43.2 ± 12.5%; OS: 42.3 ± 15.8%) vs. non-diabetics (OD: 52.1 ± 10.5%; OS: 41.7 ± 11.9%). HbA1C was significantly higher in diabetics (7.31 ± 1.13%) than non-diabetics (5.48 ± 0.67%; <i>p</i> = 0.012). Cell density (CD) and coefficient of variation (CV) showed no significant differences.</p> Conclusion <p>Diabetic patients exhibit significant changes in corneal endothelial parameters, which may indicate early endothelial dysfunction. Regular monitoring of these parameters could provide valuable insights into the ocular health of diabetic individuals.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparative study of corneal endothelial morphology and central corneal thickness in diabetic and non-diabetic patients at tertiary care centre

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月13日

查看全文
  • Surbhi Sharma,
  • Veshal Vinod Madan,
  • Susmita Banerjee

摘要

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition that affects various organs, including the eyes. Corneal endothelial dysfunction, a key factor in ocular health, can be influenced by long-term diabetes. Early detection of corneal changes, such as central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (CD), coefficient of variation (CV), and hexagonality (HEX), may provide insights into diabetic ocular complications. This study evaluates the differences in corneal endothelial parameters between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.

Aim

To compare the corneal endothelial parameters, including CCT, CD, CV, and HEX, in diabetic patients and non-diabetic controls, and assess the correlation between these parameters and the duration of diabetes.

Methodology

This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted at a tertiary eye care hospital with 100 eyes from 50 diabetic patients and 100 eyes from 50 age-matched non-diabetic controls. All participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological evaluation, including intraocular pressure measurement, refraction, best corrected visual acuity, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Corneal endothelial imaging was performed using non-contact specular microscopy to assess CCT, CD, CV, and HEX. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

In our study, diabetic patients had significantly higher central corneal thickness (CCT) in both eyes (OD: 593.9 ± 60.2 μm; OS: 610.5 ± 60.7 μm) compared to non-diabetics (OD: 550.9 ± 66.1 μm; OS: 593.9 ± 60.2 μm). Hexagonality (HEX) was lower in diabetics (OD: 43.2 ± 12.5%; OS: 42.3 ± 15.8%) vs. non-diabetics (OD: 52.1 ± 10.5%; OS: 41.7 ± 11.9%). HbA1C was significantly higher in diabetics (7.31 ± 1.13%) than non-diabetics (5.48 ± 0.67%; p = 0.012). Cell density (CD) and coefficient of variation (CV) showed no significant differences.

Conclusion

Diabetic patients exhibit significant changes in corneal endothelial parameters, which may indicate early endothelial dysfunction. Regular monitoring of these parameters could provide valuable insights into the ocular health of diabetic individuals.