Scholarlink

Background <p>Perioperative morbidity in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is closely associated with reduced physical fitness and impaired nutritional status. While prehabilitation has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), it is not yet standard of care and remains underexplored in other GI malignancies. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of a supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise program combined with nutritional counseling in a cohort of GI cancer patients scheduled for surgery.</p> Methods <p>In a prospective, two-arm, controlled trial, patients scheduled for GI cancer surgery were assigned to a prehabilitation program (2–3 sessions/week ≥ 3&#xa0;weeks, endurance and resistance training with nutritional counseling) or usual care. Primary endpoints were feasibility (eligibility, recruitment, acceptance, retention, adherence) and safety (adverse events). Secondary endpoint was quality of life (QoL; EORTC QLQ-C30 global score, SF-36 physical and mental health component scores, PCS, MCS), assessed at baseline (t0), presurgery (t1), hospital discharge (t2), and 12-week follow-up (t3).</p> Results <p>Among the 400 patients assessed for eligibility, 36% met the eligibility criteria. Of those approached, 41% consented to participate, resulting in an overall recruitment rate of 27% (<i>n</i> = 38). Of the recruited patients, 84% completed the study (<i>n</i> = 32; prehabilitation = 17; usual care = 15; mean age 63.5&#xa0;years, range 38—85; ICD-10 C15-C26). Participants attended 95% of the planned sessions (8.1 ± 3.6) within a mean of 30&#xa0;days (SD ± 16) and completed 59% at the target intensity. Nutritional counseling was provided to 94% of the patients. No intervention-related serious adverse events occurred. A modest improvement in PCS was observed in the prehabilitation group at t1 (+ 4.25 points), although this finding reached statistical significance only in the one-tailed analysis. No between-group differences were observed for global QoL or MCS.</p> Conclusion <p>Multimodal prehabilitation combining supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise with nutritional counseling is feasible and safe in a real-world GI cancer population. Recruitment and achievement of prescribed training intensity remain key challenges. Preliminary findings indicate short-term benefits for physical health, supporting further investigations in larger randomized trials.</p> Trial registration <p>DRKS00028728; prospectively registered 05/05/2022.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Exercise and nutritional prehabilitation in gastrointestinal cancer patients: prospective controlled trial assessing feasibility, safety and effects on quality of life

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月30日

查看全文
  • Laurie Assenbaum,
  • Antonia Pahl,
  • Freerk T. Baumann,
  • Cécile Weiß,
  • Hartmut Bertz,
  • Gabriel Seifert,
  • Hannes Neeff,
  • Christine Greil

摘要

Background

Perioperative morbidity in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is closely associated with reduced physical fitness and impaired nutritional status. While prehabilitation has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), it is not yet standard of care and remains underexplored in other GI malignancies. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of a supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise program combined with nutritional counseling in a cohort of GI cancer patients scheduled for surgery.

Methods

In a prospective, two-arm, controlled trial, patients scheduled for GI cancer surgery were assigned to a prehabilitation program (2–3 sessions/week ≥ 3 weeks, endurance and resistance training with nutritional counseling) or usual care. Primary endpoints were feasibility (eligibility, recruitment, acceptance, retention, adherence) and safety (adverse events). Secondary endpoint was quality of life (QoL; EORTC QLQ-C30 global score, SF-36 physical and mental health component scores, PCS, MCS), assessed at baseline (t0), presurgery (t1), hospital discharge (t2), and 12-week follow-up (t3).

Results

Among the 400 patients assessed for eligibility, 36% met the eligibility criteria. Of those approached, 41% consented to participate, resulting in an overall recruitment rate of 27% (n = 38). Of the recruited patients, 84% completed the study (n = 32; prehabilitation = 17; usual care = 15; mean age 63.5 years, range 38—85; ICD-10 C15-C26). Participants attended 95% of the planned sessions (8.1 ± 3.6) within a mean of 30 days (SD ± 16) and completed 59% at the target intensity. Nutritional counseling was provided to 94% of the patients. No intervention-related serious adverse events occurred. A modest improvement in PCS was observed in the prehabilitation group at t1 (+ 4.25 points), although this finding reached statistical significance only in the one-tailed analysis. No between-group differences were observed for global QoL or MCS.

Conclusion

Multimodal prehabilitation combining supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise with nutritional counseling is feasible and safe in a real-world GI cancer population. Recruitment and achievement of prescribed training intensity remain key challenges. Preliminary findings indicate short-term benefits for physical health, supporting further investigations in larger randomized trials.

Trial registration

DRKS00028728; prospectively registered 05/05/2022.