Scholarlink

Background <p>Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is widely used as a biomarker for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, understanding its variability across patient groups, particularly between sexes, and its underlying biological determinants is of critical importance.</p> Methods <p>We analyzed autosomal TMB and its association with DNA repair–related regulatory mechanisms in gastric cancer across TCGA-STAD and independent targeted sequencing cohorts. Sex-stratified analyses were integrated with gene expression, promoter methylation, and regression modeling.</p> Results <p>Female tumors exhibited significantly higher autosomal TMB compared with male tumors, with differences most pronounced in older female patients. Across tumors, TMB was strongly associated with reduced MLH1 expression and increased MLH1 promoter methylation, while female tumors exhibited significantly higher MLH1 methylation levels. These relationships are consistent with mismatch repair deficiency as a major driver of mutation accumulation. In multivariable regression models adjusting for MLH1 methylation and expression, the association between sex and TMB was attenuated, suggesting that MLH1-related processes contribute to the observed sex differences. Subtype-aware analyses further suggested that the female-associated TMB elevation was partly related to increased representation of MSI/MMR-deficient tumors among females, while female and male MSI tumors showed comparable TMB. Independent targeted sequencing cohorts showed consistent directional trends, although these did not reach statistical significance.</p> Conclusions <p>Together, our findings indicate that sex differences in mutation burden are linked to MLH1-associated epigenetic regulation, mismatch repair deficiency, and MSI/MMR-deficient tumor biology. These results highlight the importance of incorporating sex-specific molecular context into the interpretation of genomic biomarkers and support a more refined, biologically informed approach to precision oncology.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Sex differences in gastric cancer mutational burden reflect MLH1-associated epigenetic regulation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月15日

查看全文
  • Noa Klein,
  • Dorit Shweiki

摘要

Background

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is widely used as a biomarker for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Therefore, understanding its variability across patient groups, particularly between sexes, and its underlying biological determinants is of critical importance.

Methods

We analyzed autosomal TMB and its association with DNA repair–related regulatory mechanisms in gastric cancer across TCGA-STAD and independent targeted sequencing cohorts. Sex-stratified analyses were integrated with gene expression, promoter methylation, and regression modeling.

Results

Female tumors exhibited significantly higher autosomal TMB compared with male tumors, with differences most pronounced in older female patients. Across tumors, TMB was strongly associated with reduced MLH1 expression and increased MLH1 promoter methylation, while female tumors exhibited significantly higher MLH1 methylation levels. These relationships are consistent with mismatch repair deficiency as a major driver of mutation accumulation. In multivariable regression models adjusting for MLH1 methylation and expression, the association between sex and TMB was attenuated, suggesting that MLH1-related processes contribute to the observed sex differences. Subtype-aware analyses further suggested that the female-associated TMB elevation was partly related to increased representation of MSI/MMR-deficient tumors among females, while female and male MSI tumors showed comparable TMB. Independent targeted sequencing cohorts showed consistent directional trends, although these did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

Together, our findings indicate that sex differences in mutation burden are linked to MLH1-associated epigenetic regulation, mismatch repair deficiency, and MSI/MMR-deficient tumor biology. These results highlight the importance of incorporating sex-specific molecular context into the interpretation of genomic biomarkers and support a more refined, biologically informed approach to precision oncology.