Scholarlink

Background <p>The use of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), has significantly enhanced outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). However, validated early prognostic markers to guide treatment decisions are still limited. The PSA Kinetic Ratio, a simplified kinetic model based on PSA kinetics, may provide a practical method for early risk assessment.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a retrospective study of 146 high-volume mCSPC patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide plus ADT. The PSA Kinetic Ratio, calculated from three PSA measurements within the first 100 days of therapy (PSA₃/PSA₁), was used to classify patients into favorable (&lt; 1) or unfavorable (≥ 1) PSA kinetics. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to assess the relationships between the PSA Kinetic Ratio, treatment type, and survival outcomes.</p> Results <p>Patients with favorable PSA Kinetic Ratio (PSA Kinetic Ratio &lt;1) experienced significantly longer median PFS compared to those with unfavorable PSA kinetics in both treatment groups (log-rank <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that unfavorable PSA kinetics (PSA Kinetic Ratio ≥1) were independently associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.45–3.05; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). No significant difference in PFS was observed between abiraterone and enzalutamide within each PSA Kinetic Ratio subgroup.</p> Conclusion <p>The PSA Kinetic Ratio seems to be a promising and practical prognostic biomarker in high-volume mCSPC. Early PSA decline (Kelim &lt; 1) correlates with better outcomes, regardless of ARPI type. Incorporating it into clinical decision-making may allow for timely treatment adjustments. Prospective validation is needed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Prognostic value of PSA Kinetic Ratio in high-volume mCSPC patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide: a single-center retrospective study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月15日

查看全文
  • Sila Oksuz,
  • Oguzcan Kınıkoglu,
  • Nisanur Sariyar,
  • Mert Ozdemir,
  • Deniz Isik,
  • Heves Surmeli,
  • Seval Ay,
  • Hatice Odabas,
  • Nedim Turan

摘要

Background

The use of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs), such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), has significantly enhanced outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). However, validated early prognostic markers to guide treatment decisions are still limited. The PSA Kinetic Ratio, a simplified kinetic model based on PSA kinetics, may provide a practical method for early risk assessment.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 146 high-volume mCSPC patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide plus ADT. The PSA Kinetic Ratio, calculated from three PSA measurements within the first 100 days of therapy (PSA₃/PSA₁), was used to classify patients into favorable (< 1) or unfavorable (≥ 1) PSA kinetics. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to assess the relationships between the PSA Kinetic Ratio, treatment type, and survival outcomes.

Results

Patients with favorable PSA Kinetic Ratio (PSA Kinetic Ratio <1) experienced significantly longer median PFS compared to those with unfavorable PSA kinetics in both treatment groups (log-rank p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that unfavorable PSA kinetics (PSA Kinetic Ratio ≥1) were independently associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.45–3.05; p < 0.001). No significant difference in PFS was observed between abiraterone and enzalutamide within each PSA Kinetic Ratio subgroup.

Conclusion

The PSA Kinetic Ratio seems to be a promising and practical prognostic biomarker in high-volume mCSPC. Early PSA decline (Kelim < 1) correlates with better outcomes, regardless of ARPI type. Incorporating it into clinical decision-making may allow for timely treatment adjustments. Prospective validation is needed.