Objective <p>This study aimed to develop scientific and standard evaluation indicators related to bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery, providing a reference for clinical nurses in China.</p> Methods <p>According to the framework of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (3rd edition), nursing outcomes and indicators were screened through a literature review and clinical investigation. Subsequently, the Delphi expert consultation method was used to revise and determine the core outcomes and indicators.</p> Results <p>A total of 28 experts participated in the correspondence consultation. The valid recovery rates for the two rounds were 93.33% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient averaged 0.90, and the Kendall harmony coefficient ranged between 0.216 and 0.352 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Finally, 7 core nursing outcomes and 57 indicators were identified for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery.</p> Conclusion <p>The revised core nursing outcomes and indicators are valuable for developing specialized nursing measures and evaluating nursing outcomes for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery. Additionally, they provide a reference for promoting standardized nursing language in China.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluation indicators for bladder dysfunction in Chinese patients following cervical cancer surgery: a Delphi study based on nursing outcomes classification

  • Xianhong Han,
  • Ruiqing Di,
  • Huanjun Zhang,
  • Bingqian Zhou

摘要

Objective

This study aimed to develop scientific and standard evaluation indicators related to bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery, providing a reference for clinical nurses in China.

Methods

According to the framework of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (3rd edition), nursing outcomes and indicators were screened through a literature review and clinical investigation. Subsequently, the Delphi expert consultation method was used to revise and determine the core outcomes and indicators.

Results

A total of 28 experts participated in the correspondence consultation. The valid recovery rates for the two rounds were 93.33% and 100%, respectively. The expert authority coefficient averaged 0.90, and the Kendall harmony coefficient ranged between 0.216 and 0.352 (P < 0.05). Finally, 7 core nursing outcomes and 57 indicators were identified for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery.

Conclusion

The revised core nursing outcomes and indicators are valuable for developing specialized nursing measures and evaluating nursing outcomes for patients with bladder dysfunction after cervical cancer surgery. Additionally, they provide a reference for promoting standardized nursing language in China.