Scholarlink

Background <p>Stillbirth research priorities for Australia were identified in 2015. A renewed priority setting exercise identified current research priorities to address the national burden of stillbirth.</p> Methods <p>Bereaved parents, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and community-based support organisations participated in this priority setting partnership. Using a modified James Lind Alliance approach, proposed research questions were collated, refined and reviewed against existing evidence, with participants ranking their top ten research questions. Twenty-six key stakeholders at an in-person forum then determined the top research priorities.</p> Results <p>Consultations were attended by 243 participants, representing over 30 community and professional organisations, 219 participated (48% with lived experience of stillbirth) in the prioritisation survey. In the final prioritisation forum 25 research questions were prioritised, and six overarching priority areas identified: (1) Determine the causes of, and pathways that lead to stillbirth; (2) Identify and implement strategies to prevent stillbirth; (3) Build the capacity of health services and systems; (4) Understand and improve care for families after perinatal loss; (5) Ensure culturally safe and responsive care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families; and (6) Ensure culturally safe and responsive care for families of migrant and refugee background.</p> Conclusion <p>This process identified a relevant stillbirth research agenda to improve outcomes for women and families in Australia.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Research priorities for stillbirth in Australia: outcomes of a national priority setting partnership

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月26日

查看全文
  • Kirstin Tindal,
  • Fran Boyle,
  • Christine Andrews,
  • Chrissie Astell,
  • Jane Yelland,
  • Sarah McIntyre,
  • Bec Jenkinson,
  • Sean Seeho,
  • Miranda Davies-Tuck,
  • Deanna Stuart-Butler,
  • Philipa Middleton,
  • David Ellwood,
  • Adrienne Gordon,
  • Vicki Flenady

摘要

Background

Stillbirth research priorities for Australia were identified in 2015. A renewed priority setting exercise identified current research priorities to address the national burden of stillbirth.

Methods

Bereaved parents, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and community-based support organisations participated in this priority setting partnership. Using a modified James Lind Alliance approach, proposed research questions were collated, refined and reviewed against existing evidence, with participants ranking their top ten research questions. Twenty-six key stakeholders at an in-person forum then determined the top research priorities.

Results

Consultations were attended by 243 participants, representing over 30 community and professional organisations, 219 participated (48% with lived experience of stillbirth) in the prioritisation survey. In the final prioritisation forum 25 research questions were prioritised, and six overarching priority areas identified: (1) Determine the causes of, and pathways that lead to stillbirth; (2) Identify and implement strategies to prevent stillbirth; (3) Build the capacity of health services and systems; (4) Understand and improve care for families after perinatal loss; (5) Ensure culturally safe and responsive care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families; and (6) Ensure culturally safe and responsive care for families of migrant and refugee background.

Conclusion

This process identified a relevant stillbirth research agenda to improve outcomes for women and families in Australia.