Scholarlink

Background and aims <p>Stillbirth rate is an indicator reflecting quality of maternal healthcare services available to a pregnant woman in a country. At the community and individual level, it continues to be a public health tragedy. This paper presents the stillbirth rate, its causes and characteristics of women who experienced stillbirth from five years data of hospital-based stillbirth surveillance system. We also attempted to study the association between number of antenatal check-ups and causes of stillbirths, period of gestation and maternal parameters like presence of anaemia at the time of delivery.</p> Methodology <p>A multisite hospital-based sentinel surveillance system for estimating the stillbirth rate and its causes was established across seven tertiary care government hospitals of Delhi, India in 2015. A standardized stillbirth form was used to record information, and data was collected using an online portal from all hospitals. The data from 2016 to 2020 was analysed for calculating the stillbirth rate, its causes and maternal characteristics using STATA version 17.</p> Results <p>Of the 12,569 stillbirths recorded among 416,677 deliveries, the still birth rate over the time period 2016–2020 was 29.3 per 1000 births. Nearly 50% women who experienced stillbirths did not receive any antenatal care. Antepartum stillbirths were more common (75.7%), the remaining were the intrapartum stillbirths (24.3%). Among antepartum causes, the most prevalent maternal cause was preterm labour (25.7%) followed by placental abruption/placenta previa/hemorrhage in 15.2%. Among foetal causes, majority of the still births were due to fetal growth restriction (31.2%) followed by congenital malformations (7%). Uterine rupture and eclampsia were reported as major intrapartum causes leading to still births in 11% and 8.3% cases, respectively.</p> Conclusions <p>The stillbirth rate of 29.3 per 1,000 births from hospital data underscores the need for community-based surveillance. Nearly half of pregnant women lacked antenatal care, and 75% of stillbirths were antepartum, stressing the need to strengthen antenatal care- both coverage and quality. Routine symphysio-fundal height measurements, mandatory third-trimester ultrasounds, and partograph use may help reduce intrapartum stillbirths.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Epidemiology of stillbirths in india: findings of a multisite hospital-based sentinel surveillance from 2016 to 2020 in North India

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月28日

查看全文
  • Pratima Mittal,
  • Neena Raina,
  • Harsha Gaikwad,
  • Amita Suneja,
  • Kashika Nagpal,
  • Ashish Mandal,
  • Mamta Gupta

摘要

Background and aims

Stillbirth rate is an indicator reflecting quality of maternal healthcare services available to a pregnant woman in a country. At the community and individual level, it continues to be a public health tragedy. This paper presents the stillbirth rate, its causes and characteristics of women who experienced stillbirth from five years data of hospital-based stillbirth surveillance system. We also attempted to study the association between number of antenatal check-ups and causes of stillbirths, period of gestation and maternal parameters like presence of anaemia at the time of delivery.

Methodology

A multisite hospital-based sentinel surveillance system for estimating the stillbirth rate and its causes was established across seven tertiary care government hospitals of Delhi, India in 2015. A standardized stillbirth form was used to record information, and data was collected using an online portal from all hospitals. The data from 2016 to 2020 was analysed for calculating the stillbirth rate, its causes and maternal characteristics using STATA version 17.

Results

Of the 12,569 stillbirths recorded among 416,677 deliveries, the still birth rate over the time period 2016–2020 was 29.3 per 1000 births. Nearly 50% women who experienced stillbirths did not receive any antenatal care. Antepartum stillbirths were more common (75.7%), the remaining were the intrapartum stillbirths (24.3%). Among antepartum causes, the most prevalent maternal cause was preterm labour (25.7%) followed by placental abruption/placenta previa/hemorrhage in 15.2%. Among foetal causes, majority of the still births were due to fetal growth restriction (31.2%) followed by congenital malformations (7%). Uterine rupture and eclampsia were reported as major intrapartum causes leading to still births in 11% and 8.3% cases, respectively.

Conclusions

The stillbirth rate of 29.3 per 1,000 births from hospital data underscores the need for community-based surveillance. Nearly half of pregnant women lacked antenatal care, and 75% of stillbirths were antepartum, stressing the need to strengthen antenatal care- both coverage and quality. Routine symphysio-fundal height measurements, mandatory third-trimester ultrasounds, and partograph use may help reduce intrapartum stillbirths.