错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effect of adding metronidazole to meropenem on clinical efficacy in complicated intra-abdominal infections: a retrospective study

  • Hajime Nakashima,
  • Motoyasu Miyazaki,
  • Naoaki Nishimura,
  • Ryo Maeyama,
  • Kenji Yoshikuni,
  • Osamu Imakyure

摘要

Background

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), often caused by a diverse range of organisms, are commonly managed with appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy, particularly broad-spectrum agents such as meropenem (MEPM). Anaerobes contribute to 30%–80% of the causative pathogens, and Bacteroides fragilis, a typical anaerobe, has been reported to exhibit increased resistance to antimicrobial agents. Metronidazole (MNZ) has shown significant antibacterial activity against anaerobes and a different mechanism of action; therefore, its addition to MEPM may improve its clinical efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adding MNZ to MEPM on the clinical efficacy of empiric antimicrobial therapy for cIAI.

Methods

This retrospective study spanned 9 years and included 114 patients who underwent empiric antimicrobial therapy with MEPM monotherapy or MEPM plus MNZ combination therapy for cIAI caused by lower gastrointestinal perforation in conjunction with surgery or percutaneous drainage. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for background factors. The primary outcome was the cure rate, while secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality and the duration of hospitalization following surgical intervention.

Results

There were no significant differences in the cure rates, 28-day mortality or hospitalization durations between the MEPM monotherapy group and the MEPM plus MNZ group [cure rates: 91.2% (83/91) vs. 91.3% (21/23), respectively, p = 0.999; 28-day mortality: 2.2% (2/91) vs. 4.3% (1/23), respectively, p = 0.495; hospitalization durations, median (interquartile range): 18 days (11.5–26.5) vs. 20 days (15.5–32.0), respectively; p = 0.214]. Twenty patients were selected for each group using propensity score matching. No significant differences were observed in cure rates, 28-day mortality, or hospitalization durations between the MEPM monotherapy group and the MEPM plus MNZ group [cure rates: 85.0% (17/20) vs. 95.0% (19/20), respectively, p = 0.605; 28-day mortality: 10% (2/20) vs. 5% (1/20), respectively, p = 0.999; hospitalization durations, median (interquartile range): 16 days (11.8–24) vs. 20.5 days (16.3–38.3), respectively; p = 0.184].

Conclusion

In this single-center retrospective cohort, there was no evidence that adding MNZ to MEPM improved clinical efficacy in empiric antimicrobial therapy with infection-source control in cIAI.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.