Scholarlink

<p>Antimicrobial surfaces have the potential to continuously self-decontaminate, which can play a key role in infection control. Various surface treatment sprays are available on the market today, differing in their chemical compositions and active ingredients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these surface treatment sprays in real-life settings. The effects of the sprays were examined both in vitro, using bacterial suspensions, and in real-life settings. Effectiveness was measured by the number of colony-forming units (CFU) and by ATP tests. Additionally, the microbiome of one door opener was sequenced to identify the predominant microbes on that surface. Sequencing revealed that the microbiome of the door openers is mainly composed of skin bacteria. <i>Staphylococcus</i> (49.2%) and <i>Micrococcus</i> (33.6%) were the dominant genera identified in the sample. In vitro experiments demonstrated that all spray treatments were effective when tested against bacteria in suspension. However, in real-life settings, none of our measurements detected a significant reduction in microbial presence following spray treatment. We hypothesize that this discrepancy is due to the presence of a fatty substance, likely from fingerprints, on surfaces. This oily layer may act as a barrier that physically separates microbes from the treated surfaces, thereby diminishing the efficacy of the antimicrobial sprays.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effect of long-lasting antimicrobial surface sprays in real-life environment

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月4日

查看全文
  • Szava Bansaghi,
  • Gábor Gulyás,
  • Tamás Járay,
  • Dóra Tombácz,
  • Zsolt Boldogkői,
  • Jörn Klein

摘要

Antimicrobial surfaces have the potential to continuously self-decontaminate, which can play a key role in infection control. Various surface treatment sprays are available on the market today, differing in their chemical compositions and active ingredients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of these surface treatment sprays in real-life settings. The effects of the sprays were examined both in vitro, using bacterial suspensions, and in real-life settings. Effectiveness was measured by the number of colony-forming units (CFU) and by ATP tests. Additionally, the microbiome of one door opener was sequenced to identify the predominant microbes on that surface. Sequencing revealed that the microbiome of the door openers is mainly composed of skin bacteria. Staphylococcus (49.2%) and Micrococcus (33.6%) were the dominant genera identified in the sample. In vitro experiments demonstrated that all spray treatments were effective when tested against bacteria in suspension. However, in real-life settings, none of our measurements detected a significant reduction in microbial presence following spray treatment. We hypothesize that this discrepancy is due to the presence of a fatty substance, likely from fingerprints, on surfaces. This oily layer may act as a barrier that physically separates microbes from the treated surfaces, thereby diminishing the efficacy of the antimicrobial sprays.