Background <p>COVID-19 patients frequently present with various comorbidities. Two developed antiviral medications, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir, have been utilized in COVID-19 patients; but comparisons of the effectiveness between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in COVID-19 patients with different comorbidities remain unknown. This study aims to compare the effectiveness, including invasive ventilation and mortality, of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in the overall population and populations with various comorbidities in Taiwanese patients during the omicron BA.2 wave.</p> Methods <p>We retrospectively collected electronic medical records from the Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database between January and December 2022 and conducted an analysis of adult patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. For data management, we performed propensity score matching to minimize the imbalance between two groups; the standardized mean difference &gt; 0.1 or a p value &lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant. Variables, which remained imbalanced after matching, were adjusted by cox regression model. To identify the risk associated with these variables, a Cox proportional hazards model were performed. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate invasive ventilation and mortality, comparing survival curves between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users and molnupiravir users.</p> Results <p>Our cohort was recruited from a database, including patients who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir treatment. Out of a total of 35,617 patients, 968 patients received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and 1198 patients received molnupiravir after matching. Patients with chronic liver disease or mental disease on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir had lower risks of intubation than those on molnupiravir. Overall, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir reduced mortality risk by 65% (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14–0.88, <i>p</i> = 0.026). For patients with diabetes mellitus (aHR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.78, <i>p</i> = 0.014), with chronic kidney disease (aHR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10–0.68, <i>p</i> = 0.007), or aged over 65 years (aHR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.70, <i>p</i> = 0.005), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing mortality risk compared to molnupiravir.</p> Conclusions <p>Data revealed that both nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir demonstrated clinical benefits in treating COVID-19 patients in a real-world setting. Moreover, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a lower risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients with specific circumstances.</p> Clinical trial <p>Clinical trial number is not applicable.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Effectiveness comparison of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir versus molnupiravir in COVID-19 patients with comorbidities in Taiwan: a multi-centre electronic health record study

  • Wen-Kuang Lin,
  • Shwu-Jiuan Lin,
  • Yu-Hui Chang,
  • Fu-Der Wang,
  • Phung-Anh Nguyen,
  • Phan Thanh Phuc,
  • Whitney Burton,
  • Nguyen Thi Kim Hien,
  • Chia-Chieh Lin,
  • Carlos Shu-Kei Lam,
  • To-Chi Ha,
  • Christine Y. Lu,
  • Chih-Wei Huang,
  • Hsuan-Chia Yang,
  • Shiue-Ming Lin,
  • Chieh Yang,
  • Li-Hsuan Wang,
  • Jason C. Hsu

摘要

Background

COVID-19 patients frequently present with various comorbidities. Two developed antiviral medications, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir, have been utilized in COVID-19 patients; but comparisons of the effectiveness between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in COVID-19 patients with different comorbidities remain unknown. This study aims to compare the effectiveness, including invasive ventilation and mortality, of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir in the overall population and populations with various comorbidities in Taiwanese patients during the omicron BA.2 wave.

Methods

We retrospectively collected electronic medical records from the Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database between January and December 2022 and conducted an analysis of adult patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. For data management, we performed propensity score matching to minimize the imbalance between two groups; the standardized mean difference > 0.1 or a p value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Variables, which remained imbalanced after matching, were adjusted by cox regression model. To identify the risk associated with these variables, a Cox proportional hazards model were performed. Kaplan-Meier method was applied to estimate invasive ventilation and mortality, comparing survival curves between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir users and molnupiravir users.

Results

Our cohort was recruited from a database, including patients who receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or molnupiravir treatment. Out of a total of 35,617 patients, 968 patients received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and 1198 patients received molnupiravir after matching. Patients with chronic liver disease or mental disease on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir had lower risks of intubation than those on molnupiravir. Overall, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir reduced mortality risk by 65% (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14–0.88, p = 0.026). For patients with diabetes mellitus (aHR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.78, p = 0.014), with chronic kidney disease (aHR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10–0.68, p = 0.007), or aged over 65 years (aHR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.70, p = 0.005), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir demonstrated superior efficacy in reducing mortality risk compared to molnupiravir.

Conclusions

Data revealed that both nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir demonstrated clinical benefits in treating COVID-19 patients in a real-world setting. Moreover, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a lower risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients with specific circumstances.

Clinical trial

Clinical trial number is not applicable.