Background <p>Monitoring response to Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment is burdensome to TB programmes and may benefit from alternative effective tools. We evaluated the concordance of alternative bacteriological measures of response to therapy (AMRT) with sputum culture during the initial sixteen weeks of MDR-TB treatment.</p> Methods <p>In a prospective study of MDR/RR-TB among smear positive adults, aged 18-years and above. Pooled early morning and spot sputa were obtained before treatment initiation (95% on Bdq, Lzd, Lfx, Cfz, Cs regimen) and at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16 during treatment between 14/02/2020 and 09/02/2024. Samples were tested using Concentrated Fluorescent Microscopy (CFM), Fluorescein-di-acetate (FDA)-Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) vital smear microscopy, the Tuberculosis-Molecular bacterial load assay (TB-MBLA), and Middle brook 7H11 selective (MB7H11S) colony-forming units as the AMRT. Concordance of the AMRT for sputum conversion determination was compared to Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture conversion at weeks 12 and 16 of treatment.</p> Results <p>A total of 101 MDR/RR-TB patients were screened of which 42 were smear negative. Fifty-nine participants were enrolled, of whom 58 (98%) provided baseline sputa and these were included in the analysis. The concordance, n/N (%) of each AMRT test with MGIT culture conversion at week 12 were: 31/35(88.6%) for CFM, 32/33 (97.0%) for FDA, and 25/26 (96.2%) for TB-MBLA, and 11/11 (100%) for MB7H11S. At week 16, concordance of each AMRT were: 39/40 (97.5%) for CFM, 35/36 (97.2%) for FDA, 32/32 (100%) for TB-MBLA, and 15/15 (100%) for MB7H11S. Among people living with HIV, the concordances of AMRT with MGIT culture conversion varied at week 8 but was 100% for all tests at weeks 12 and 16. Baseline clinical and/or bacteriological factors did not influence the concordance of AMRT to MGIT culture conversion at weeks 12, and 16.</p> Conclusion <p>Our data show that concentrated Fluorescent smear, Fluorescein-di-acetate smear microscopy, and TB-MBLA are suitable alternative measures of response to TB therapy compared to MGIT culture among MDR-TB participants. Use of these alternative rapid methods may allow timely decision making as well as rapid evaluation of alternative MDR-TB treatment regimens.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Performance evaluation of alternative bacteriological measures of response to MDR/RR-TB therapy during the initial 16 weeks of treatment

  • Willy Ssengooba,
  • Emmanuel Musisi,
  • Derrick Semugenze,
  • Kevin Komakech,
  • Moses Ndema,
  • Christine Sekaggya-Wiltshire,
  • Susan Adakun,
  • Derek J. Sloan,
  • Achilles Katamba,
  • Mohammed Lamorde,
  • Moses Joloba,
  • Wilber Sabiiti

摘要

Background

Monitoring response to Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment is burdensome to TB programmes and may benefit from alternative effective tools. We evaluated the concordance of alternative bacteriological measures of response to therapy (AMRT) with sputum culture during the initial sixteen weeks of MDR-TB treatment.

Methods

In a prospective study of MDR/RR-TB among smear positive adults, aged 18-years and above. Pooled early morning and spot sputa were obtained before treatment initiation (95% on Bdq, Lzd, Lfx, Cfz, Cs regimen) and at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16 during treatment between 14/02/2020 and 09/02/2024. Samples were tested using Concentrated Fluorescent Microscopy (CFM), Fluorescein-di-acetate (FDA)-Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB) vital smear microscopy, the Tuberculosis-Molecular bacterial load assay (TB-MBLA), and Middle brook 7H11 selective (MB7H11S) colony-forming units as the AMRT. Concordance of the AMRT for sputum conversion determination was compared to Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture conversion at weeks 12 and 16 of treatment.

Results

A total of 101 MDR/RR-TB patients were screened of which 42 were smear negative. Fifty-nine participants were enrolled, of whom 58 (98%) provided baseline sputa and these were included in the analysis. The concordance, n/N (%) of each AMRT test with MGIT culture conversion at week 12 were: 31/35(88.6%) for CFM, 32/33 (97.0%) for FDA, and 25/26 (96.2%) for TB-MBLA, and 11/11 (100%) for MB7H11S. At week 16, concordance of each AMRT were: 39/40 (97.5%) for CFM, 35/36 (97.2%) for FDA, 32/32 (100%) for TB-MBLA, and 15/15 (100%) for MB7H11S. Among people living with HIV, the concordances of AMRT with MGIT culture conversion varied at week 8 but was 100% for all tests at weeks 12 and 16. Baseline clinical and/or bacteriological factors did not influence the concordance of AMRT to MGIT culture conversion at weeks 12, and 16.

Conclusion

Our data show that concentrated Fluorescent smear, Fluorescein-di-acetate smear microscopy, and TB-MBLA are suitable alternative measures of response to TB therapy compared to MGIT culture among MDR-TB participants. Use of these alternative rapid methods may allow timely decision making as well as rapid evaluation of alternative MDR-TB treatment regimens.