Scholarlink

Background <p>The era of universal treatment for HIV has seen high rates of disengagement from antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs and re-engagement after interruptions, with modeled estimates of non-naïve initiators &gt; 50% in many places. Most re-engagers are reluctant to admit prior antiretroviral exposure, and non-self-reported data on proportions reinitiating are scarce. We conducted a sequential, mixed-methods study to explore the proportion of people who present for initiation with evidence of prior ART use and understand why many are reluctant to admit prior exposure in South Africa.</p> Methods <p>We enrolled a sequential sample of adults presenting to initiate ART or re-initiate ART after an interruption &gt; 3 months and collected (1) self-reported previous treatment experience; (2) electronic medical record (EMR) evidence of prior ART clinic visits; (3) baseline blood tests for metabolites of tenofovir diphosphate; and (4) laboratory records indicating prior ART-related tests. Interviews were conducted with clients who self-reported no prior ART use but had evidence of metabolites.</p> Results <p>Among 89 enrolled participants (median age 32.5, 62% female), 21 (24%) self-reported previously taking ART &gt; 3 months prior to enrolment. An additional 19 (21%) who did not self-report prior exposure had EMR or laboratory evidence of prior ART use, for a total of 40 (45%) clients with known prior treatment exposure at initiation. Sensitivity of self-report was 40% (95% CI: 25–57%), EMR 43% (27–59%), metabolite testing 45% (29–62%), and laboratory records 73% (56–87%). Interviewees (<i>n</i> = 11) reported opting to present as naïve because they perceived that disclosure of prior disengagement would cause delays accessing treatment, require additional documentation, and elicit negative responses from healthcare workers. Study limitations included short duration of metabolite detectability, inability to link individuals within the EMR to discern ART experience at other facilities, and lack of baseline viral load testing.</p> Conclusions <p>At least 45% of clients initiating ART in South Africa have prior treatment experience, but only a third of re-initiators voluntarily reveal this. Laboratory records yielded the most accurate results for ascertaining prior treatment exposure. As numbers re-engaging in HIV care after a treatment interruption increase, understanding reluctance to self-report ART experience and exploring opportunities to overcome barriers are critical for preventing repeated interruptions.</p> Registration <p>The protocol was registered on July 12, 2022 on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05454839).</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Prior antiretroviral therapy exposure among clients presenting for HIV treatment initiation in South Africa: an exploratory mixed-methods study using multiple indicators of exposure

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月26日

查看全文
  • Mariet Benade,
  • Mhairi Maskew,
  • Vinolia Ntjikelane,
  • Nancy Scott,
  • Nkosinathi Ngcobo,
  • Brooke Nichols,
  • Lufuno Malala,
  • Musa Manganye,
  • Sydney Rosen

摘要

Background

The era of universal treatment for HIV has seen high rates of disengagement from antiretroviral therapy (ART) programs and re-engagement after interruptions, with modeled estimates of non-naïve initiators > 50% in many places. Most re-engagers are reluctant to admit prior antiretroviral exposure, and non-self-reported data on proportions reinitiating are scarce. We conducted a sequential, mixed-methods study to explore the proportion of people who present for initiation with evidence of prior ART use and understand why many are reluctant to admit prior exposure in South Africa.

Methods

We enrolled a sequential sample of adults presenting to initiate ART or re-initiate ART after an interruption > 3 months and collected (1) self-reported previous treatment experience; (2) electronic medical record (EMR) evidence of prior ART clinic visits; (3) baseline blood tests for metabolites of tenofovir diphosphate; and (4) laboratory records indicating prior ART-related tests. Interviews were conducted with clients who self-reported no prior ART use but had evidence of metabolites.

Results

Among 89 enrolled participants (median age 32.5, 62% female), 21 (24%) self-reported previously taking ART > 3 months prior to enrolment. An additional 19 (21%) who did not self-report prior exposure had EMR or laboratory evidence of prior ART use, for a total of 40 (45%) clients with known prior treatment exposure at initiation. Sensitivity of self-report was 40% (95% CI: 25–57%), EMR 43% (27–59%), metabolite testing 45% (29–62%), and laboratory records 73% (56–87%). Interviewees (n = 11) reported opting to present as naïve because they perceived that disclosure of prior disengagement would cause delays accessing treatment, require additional documentation, and elicit negative responses from healthcare workers. Study limitations included short duration of metabolite detectability, inability to link individuals within the EMR to discern ART experience at other facilities, and lack of baseline viral load testing.

Conclusions

At least 45% of clients initiating ART in South Africa have prior treatment experience, but only a third of re-initiators voluntarily reveal this. Laboratory records yielded the most accurate results for ascertaining prior treatment exposure. As numbers re-engaging in HIV care after a treatment interruption increase, understanding reluctance to self-report ART experience and exploring opportunities to overcome barriers are critical for preventing repeated interruptions.

Registration

The protocol was registered on July 12, 2022 on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05454839).