Background <p>Molecular identification of fungal agents in otomycosis can provide a more accurate diagnosis and differentiation of species compared to conventional morphological methods. Previous reviews mostly relied on studies using conventional methods to explore the prevalence and distribution of otomycosis etiologies. We aim to estimate the prevalence and distribution of causative agents in otomycosis cases confirmed with molecular methods.</p> Methods <p>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We selected cross-sectional studies that reported causative agents of otomycosis and used molecular methods for identification of fungi. We appraised the quality of evidence using the JBI Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Clinical and mycological data were collected, and prevalence of otomycosis was estimated by meta-analysis.</p> Results <p>Twenty studies reporting 1392 fungal isolates, consisting of 46 species from 11 distinct genera, were included in this review. The prevalence of otomycosis among clinically-suspected patients was 58.3% (95% CI: 41.4–73.5%). <i>Aspergillus</i> (75.8%, 95% CI: 70.3–80.6%) and <i>Candida</i> (15.3%, 95% CI: 8.7– 25.6%) were the most common etiologies. The most frequent <i>Aspergillus</i> species were <i>A. niger</i> (<i>n</i> = 352, 30.9%) and <i>A. tubingensis</i> (<i>n</i> = 270, 23.7%), and the most frequent <i>Candida</i> species were <i>C. parapsilosis</i> (<i>n</i> = 85, 39.7%) and <i>C. albicans</i> (<i>n</i> = 66, 30.8%). The quality of evidence was assessed to be poor in all included studies.</p> Conclusions <p>Otomycosis is caused by a diverse set of species, predominantly from <i>Aspergillus</i> and <i>Candida</i> genera. Molecular identification techniques provide a more accurate understanding of the distribution of species associated with otomycosis.</p> Clinical trial number <p>Not applicable.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Otomycosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and causative agents in the era of molecular diagnostics

  • Tina Nazari,
  • Fatemeh Peymaeei,
  • Romina Ghazi Mirsaid,
  • Reihaneh Seiad Ahmadnezhad,
  • Arsalan Bateni Shalmani,
  • Shahram Mahmoudi

摘要

Background

Molecular identification of fungal agents in otomycosis can provide a more accurate diagnosis and differentiation of species compared to conventional morphological methods. Previous reviews mostly relied on studies using conventional methods to explore the prevalence and distribution of otomycosis etiologies. We aim to estimate the prevalence and distribution of causative agents in otomycosis cases confirmed with molecular methods.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We selected cross-sectional studies that reported causative agents of otomycosis and used molecular methods for identification of fungi. We appraised the quality of evidence using the JBI Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Clinical and mycological data were collected, and prevalence of otomycosis was estimated by meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty studies reporting 1392 fungal isolates, consisting of 46 species from 11 distinct genera, were included in this review. The prevalence of otomycosis among clinically-suspected patients was 58.3% (95% CI: 41.4–73.5%). Aspergillus (75.8%, 95% CI: 70.3–80.6%) and Candida (15.3%, 95% CI: 8.7– 25.6%) were the most common etiologies. The most frequent Aspergillus species were A. niger (n = 352, 30.9%) and A. tubingensis (n = 270, 23.7%), and the most frequent Candida species were C. parapsilosis (n = 85, 39.7%) and C. albicans (n = 66, 30.8%). The quality of evidence was assessed to be poor in all included studies.

Conclusions

Otomycosis is caused by a diverse set of species, predominantly from Aspergillus and Candida genera. Molecular identification techniques provide a more accurate understanding of the distribution of species associated with otomycosis.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.