Scholarlink

Background <p>Mutual aid among older residents is increasingly important in ageing communities in Japan. However, little is known about how mutual aid is actually formed and reconfigured across socially different districts within the same municipality.</p> Methods <p>This comparative qualitative study analysed semi-structured interviews with 11 community-dwelling older residents aged 77–90 years in one rural Japanese municipality (fishing district, <i>n</i> = 6; in-migrant “I-turn” district, <i>n</i> = 5). Seven interview sessions were conducted across the two districts, totalling 597&#xa0;min. The primary analysis used Kuckartz-based qualitative text analysis. The Trajectory Equifinality Approach / Trajectory Equifinality Modeling (TEA/TEM) was then used as a secondary interpretive framework to reinterpret how mutual aid changed over irreversible time.</p> Results <p>Four synthesized comparative themes were identified. First, in the fishing district, mutual aid was supported by long-term co-residence, neighbours’ routine awareness of doors, curtains, and other daily signs, neighbourly access to homes when needed, and an expectation that help would be reciprocated over time. Second, in the I-turn district, mutual aid was more often built intentionally through participation in local activities, transport arrangements, and selectively cultivated friendships after migration. Third, across both districts, ageing and health events shifted residents between providing help and receiving help. Fourth, mutual aid had clear relational boundaries: not all residents were equally involved in neighbourhood activities or ties, and helping coexisted with restraint, privacy/non-intrusion, and family-first norms. Mutual aid was experienced not as a fixed role but as a shifting position between providing and receiving help over time.</p> Conclusions <p>Mutual aid among older residents was neither uniform across districts nor fixed over time. Rather, it was shaped by district-specific relational infrastructures and reconfigured through age-related changes in health, mobility, and everyday routines. Community interventions should therefore be tailored to the relational infrastructure already present in each district and should support modest, repeatable opportunities for reciprocal contact and gentle monitoring.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Mutual aid among older residents in two socially different districts of a rural municipality in Japan: a comparative qualitative study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月3日

查看全文
  • Yoshiko Ohno,
  • Eriko Tane,
  • Yukari Ishida,
  • Keiko Maeda,
  • Eriko Takayama,
  • Miku Yanokuchi,
  • Yu Shiroma

摘要

Background

Mutual aid among older residents is increasingly important in ageing communities in Japan. However, little is known about how mutual aid is actually formed and reconfigured across socially different districts within the same municipality.

Methods

This comparative qualitative study analysed semi-structured interviews with 11 community-dwelling older residents aged 77–90 years in one rural Japanese municipality (fishing district, n = 6; in-migrant “I-turn” district, n = 5). Seven interview sessions were conducted across the two districts, totalling 597 min. The primary analysis used Kuckartz-based qualitative text analysis. The Trajectory Equifinality Approach / Trajectory Equifinality Modeling (TEA/TEM) was then used as a secondary interpretive framework to reinterpret how mutual aid changed over irreversible time.

Results

Four synthesized comparative themes were identified. First, in the fishing district, mutual aid was supported by long-term co-residence, neighbours’ routine awareness of doors, curtains, and other daily signs, neighbourly access to homes when needed, and an expectation that help would be reciprocated over time. Second, in the I-turn district, mutual aid was more often built intentionally through participation in local activities, transport arrangements, and selectively cultivated friendships after migration. Third, across both districts, ageing and health events shifted residents between providing help and receiving help. Fourth, mutual aid had clear relational boundaries: not all residents were equally involved in neighbourhood activities or ties, and helping coexisted with restraint, privacy/non-intrusion, and family-first norms. Mutual aid was experienced not as a fixed role but as a shifting position between providing and receiving help over time.

Conclusions

Mutual aid among older residents was neither uniform across districts nor fixed over time. Rather, it was shaped by district-specific relational infrastructures and reconfigured through age-related changes in health, mobility, and everyday routines. Community interventions should therefore be tailored to the relational infrastructure already present in each district and should support modest, repeatable opportunities for reciprocal contact and gentle monitoring.