Background <p>This study aimed to clarify the influence of frailty on the adjustability of grasping force (AGF) in community-dwelling older adults.</p> Methods <p>This cross-sectional study included 23 community-dwelling older adults. Participants were assessed for basic information, the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study (J-CHS) criteria, the Frenchay Activities Index, and AGF. The participants were classified into the robust and non-robust groups based on the J-CHS criteria. AGF was quantified using the AGF score, defined as the absolute error between the target and actual grasping force; lower AGF scores indicated better AGF.</p> Results <p>The non-robust group showed significantly lower AGF scores than the robust group in the total (<i>p</i> = 0.02), isometric (<i>p</i> = 0.04), and concentric (<i>p</i> = 0.01) sections of the non-dominant hand, indicating better AGF. In the robust group, AGF scores in the concentric section differed significantly between the dominant and non-dominant hands (<i>p</i> = 0.02), with the dominant hand showing a lower AGF score, indicating better AGF. In the non-robust group, AGF scores in the isometric section differed significantly between the dominant and non-dominant hands (<i>p</i> = 0.04), with the non-dominant hand showing a lower AGF score, indicating better AGF.</p> Conclusions <p>These findings suggest that non-robust older adults may compensate for functional limitations by enhancing AGF in the non-dominant hand.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The effect of frailty on the adjustability of grasping force in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study

  • Tatsuya Kaneno,
  • Akihiro Sato,
  • Kazunori Akizuki,
  • Jun Yabuki,
  • Satoshi Shibata,
  • Yoshifumi Morita

摘要

Background

This study aimed to clarify the influence of frailty on the adjustability of grasping force (AGF) in community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 23 community-dwelling older adults. Participants were assessed for basic information, the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study (J-CHS) criteria, the Frenchay Activities Index, and AGF. The participants were classified into the robust and non-robust groups based on the J-CHS criteria. AGF was quantified using the AGF score, defined as the absolute error between the target and actual grasping force; lower AGF scores indicated better AGF.

Results

The non-robust group showed significantly lower AGF scores than the robust group in the total (p = 0.02), isometric (p = 0.04), and concentric (p = 0.01) sections of the non-dominant hand, indicating better AGF. In the robust group, AGF scores in the concentric section differed significantly between the dominant and non-dominant hands (p = 0.02), with the dominant hand showing a lower AGF score, indicating better AGF. In the non-robust group, AGF scores in the isometric section differed significantly between the dominant and non-dominant hands (p = 0.04), with the non-dominant hand showing a lower AGF score, indicating better AGF.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that non-robust older adults may compensate for functional limitations by enhancing AGF in the non-dominant hand.