Feasibility of hand grip tests during and after hospitalization in geriatric patients: an observational study

Monitoring the recovery trajectory during and after hospitalization can be a valuable method to observe whether additional care is needed to optimize recovery. Hand grip strength tests are commonly used to measure an individual’s physical condition. Eforto® is a system to monitor hand grip strength and grip work as measures of recovery. We examined the feasibility of daily repeated hand grip tests measured with Eforto® in geriatric inpatients, during hospitalization and at home after discharge.

Geriatric inpatients (n = 191) were evaluated for grip strength and grip work with Eforto®, twice daily during their admission. We calculated attempt and success rates. Participants were divided into complete, high, moderate, and low attempt/success rate groups to study differences in patient characteristics. Reasons for non-attempt and unsuccessful tests were categorized and analyzed. Nine participants were interviewed about acceptability and user experience within the hospital setting. Four out of twenty participants accepted the invitation to continue the measurements after discharge at home for 4 weeks and were interviewed about acceptability and user experience.

Across the 191 participants, the attempt rate was 85% and 86% of the attempted tests was successful. The main reasons for non-attempt were that the patient felt physically unwell (41%), and that the patient was otherwise engaged, for example receiving care or undergoing medical tests (40%). Measurements were unsuccessful mostly because of the patient not having enough strength to reach the 80% threshold needed for the grip work test (60%). Participants in the complete and high attempt/success rate groups had a shorter length of stay (p<0.05) and a lower mortality (p<0.05) than participants in the moderate/low groups. The interview data showed good acceptability and user experience during hospitalization. The acceptability was strengthened by experienced usefulness. Self-monitoring at home resulted in low inclusion rate (20%) and low success rate (25%), with the uncertain time after discharge from the hospital as the main barrier.

For most patients, the tests were feasible in the supervised hospital setting. At-home testing with Eforto® is challenging, primarily because of the uncertain time after discharge from the hospital.