Introduction <p>To compare serological and CT imaging parameters between the mild and severe portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) group, and find out the non-invasive&#xa0;predictive markers for PHG severity based on these differences.</p> Methods <p>Three hundred one patients were enrolled in our retrospective study. The PHG severity was assessed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and serological markers were measured within 48&#xa0;h before EGD, and CT scans were performed within one week after EGD. Differences in age, gender, etiology, serological and CT imaging parameters, and arterial-phase gastric wall enhancement in CT scans were analyzed between the mild and severe PHG groups.</p> Results <p>No significant differences were observed in gender, age, etiology, serological markers, or MELD score between the two groups (all <i>P</i> &gt; 0.05). However, spleen length, spleen volume, PLT/spleen length ratio, and PLT/spleen volume ratio differed significantly (<i>P</i> = 0.003, 0.011, 0.019, and 0.014, respectively). The optimal cutoff values for predicting PHG severity were 131.4 (AUC = 0.619), 613.29 (AUC = 0.596), 0.42 (AUC = 0.588), and 0.07 (AUC = 0.592), respectively. Patients with severe PHG demonstrated significantly greater arterial-phase gastric wall enhancement compared to mild PHG cases.</p> Conclusion <p>Spleen length, spleen volume, and the platelet-to-spleen ratios presented predictive value for PHG severity, albeit with limited discriminative ability. Additionally, moderate-to-severe arterial phase gastric wall enhancement in CT scans may serve as a potential indicator of severe PHG.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Role of non-invasive serological and CT imaging parameters in assessing portal hypertensive gastropathy severity

  • Zhenzhen Liu,
  • Bilun Ke,
  • Shuyan Tan,
  • Zhicheng Zhang,
  • Dandan Shan,
  • Jie Qin,
  • Siwei Tan

摘要

Introduction

To compare serological and CT imaging parameters between the mild and severe portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) group, and find out the non-invasive predictive markers for PHG severity based on these differences.

Methods

Three hundred one patients were enrolled in our retrospective study. The PHG severity was assessed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and serological markers were measured within 48 h before EGD, and CT scans were performed within one week after EGD. Differences in age, gender, etiology, serological and CT imaging parameters, and arterial-phase gastric wall enhancement in CT scans were analyzed between the mild and severe PHG groups.

Results

No significant differences were observed in gender, age, etiology, serological markers, or MELD score between the two groups (all P > 0.05). However, spleen length, spleen volume, PLT/spleen length ratio, and PLT/spleen volume ratio differed significantly (P = 0.003, 0.011, 0.019, and 0.014, respectively). The optimal cutoff values for predicting PHG severity were 131.4 (AUC = 0.619), 613.29 (AUC = 0.596), 0.42 (AUC = 0.588), and 0.07 (AUC = 0.592), respectively. Patients with severe PHG demonstrated significantly greater arterial-phase gastric wall enhancement compared to mild PHG cases.

Conclusion

Spleen length, spleen volume, and the platelet-to-spleen ratios presented predictive value for PHG severity, albeit with limited discriminative ability. Additionally, moderate-to-severe arterial phase gastric wall enhancement in CT scans may serve as a potential indicator of severe PHG.