Scholarlink

Background <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool in general practice. However, its actual use among French general practitioners (GPs) working in urgent care settings, such as SOS Médecins, a nationwide network of GPs providing home-based urgent primary care 24/7, remains poorly documented.</p> Objectives <p>To assess the prevalence, modalities of use, self-reported perceived impact, and barriers to the adoption of POCUS among GPs working in the SOS Médecins network across France.</p> Methods <p>A national cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all eligible SOS Médecins GPs. The questionnaire addressed POCUS usage, clinical indications, equipment access, perceived benefits, training needs, and adoption barriers. Descriptive statistics were used, and comparisons between users and non-users were performed using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.</p> Results <p>Among 211 respondents, 47.9% reported current POCUS use. Statistically significant differences between users and non-users were observed for age group (<i>p</i> = 0.021) and years of experience in SOS Médecins (<i>p</i> = 0.003). The most frequent indications included abdominal pain (79.2%), vascular assessment (76.2%), and respiratory symptoms (65.3%). Most users relied on portable devices (69.8%) and performed focused, indication‑driven scans (87.4%). POCUS was perceived as having a positive or very positive impact on triage (86.0%), treatment decisions (81.7%), faster diagnosis (67.0%), professional autonomy (59.0%), and the doctor–patient relationship (50.0%). Nevertheless, only 15.6% of users reported billing for POCUS acts. Among non-users, the main barriers were lack of specific training (63.6%), limited time (44.5%), equipment cost (40%), and doubts about clinical utility (23.6%). More than half (54.5%) expressed interest in receiving training.</p> Conclusion <p>POCUS is currently used by nearly half of SOS Médecins GPs providing urgent primary care in France. Despite strong clinical interest and perceived utility, adoption remains limited by training gaps, structural barriers, and lack of clear financial incentives.</p> <p>Future national strategies should prioritize the development and structuring of undergraduate POCUS education in medical schools, alongside expanded continuing training opportunities, improved financial recognition, and local mentorship initiatives, to support equitable and sustainable integration into French primary care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in French urgent primary care: a national survey of general practitioners in the SOS Médecins network

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月27日

查看全文
  • Nawele Boublay,
  • Pascal Rippert,
  • Touria Hajri,
  • Julien Berthiller,
  • Anne-Marie Schott-Pethelaz,
  • Pauline Bertois

摘要

Background

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool in general practice. However, its actual use among French general practitioners (GPs) working in urgent care settings, such as SOS Médecins, a nationwide network of GPs providing home-based urgent primary care 24/7, remains poorly documented.

Objectives

To assess the prevalence, modalities of use, self-reported perceived impact, and barriers to the adoption of POCUS among GPs working in the SOS Médecins network across France.

Methods

A national cross-sectional online survey was distributed to all eligible SOS Médecins GPs. The questionnaire addressed POCUS usage, clinical indications, equipment access, perceived benefits, training needs, and adoption barriers. Descriptive statistics were used, and comparisons between users and non-users were performed using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

Among 211 respondents, 47.9% reported current POCUS use. Statistically significant differences between users and non-users were observed for age group (p = 0.021) and years of experience in SOS Médecins (p = 0.003). The most frequent indications included abdominal pain (79.2%), vascular assessment (76.2%), and respiratory symptoms (65.3%). Most users relied on portable devices (69.8%) and performed focused, indication‑driven scans (87.4%). POCUS was perceived as having a positive or very positive impact on triage (86.0%), treatment decisions (81.7%), faster diagnosis (67.0%), professional autonomy (59.0%), and the doctor–patient relationship (50.0%). Nevertheless, only 15.6% of users reported billing for POCUS acts. Among non-users, the main barriers were lack of specific training (63.6%), limited time (44.5%), equipment cost (40%), and doubts about clinical utility (23.6%). More than half (54.5%) expressed interest in receiving training.

Conclusion

POCUS is currently used by nearly half of SOS Médecins GPs providing urgent primary care in France. Despite strong clinical interest and perceived utility, adoption remains limited by training gaps, structural barriers, and lack of clear financial incentives.

Future national strategies should prioritize the development and structuring of undergraduate POCUS education in medical schools, alongside expanded continuing training opportunities, improved financial recognition, and local mentorship initiatives, to support equitable and sustainable integration into French primary care.